Omega wrote:An ignorant response if I ever saw one. Failure in every aspect? Would you care to elaborate more?
I find absolutely stupid to label something as a failure when:
1) Is the successor to the most successful videogame system of all time
2) It has the support of some of the best gaming companies behind
3) It has 3D. Guess what? You can turn off the 3D entirely and you still have a gaming handheld-- and a Nintendo one nonetheless, company that has totally dominated the market since the 90's.
4) More importantly than anything, is not even out yet for Pete's sake (at least in Europe and North America), so it makes absolutely no sense call it a failure
You should consider more what you are going to say next.
You've listed nothing to credit the device anything but its past life. For the record, the DS was a failure in the eyes of any legitimate hard-core gamer. If you want to play "Cooking-Mama 3D" or a silly reboot of MGS, go ahead. Don't try and sugar coat the fact that Nintendo has been a lazy company for the past few years, and have done nothing to please their original fans. Instead, they dish out hundreds of terrible games for the moderately retarded generation (they probably had a hand in creating) as they laugh all the way to the bank.
Also, since you seem to have that superior air about you, let me explain something:
When asking someone to elaborate after an explanation, there is no reason to ask of them to elaborate more. The word elaborate serves that exact purpose.
Lastly, you're acting like I'm the only one with this obviously literature guided opinion. For your information 'Omega", several columnists with inside information are already labeling this a gimmick. This is no different than Sonys PSP Go; a quick, pointless and unnecessary cash in.
PS: The most successful video game system of all time is the PlayStation 2. Actually, the DS wouldn't even be second if it wasn't for the fact that Nintendo managed to squeeze several additional versions with features that should have been in the first.