http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299930/
i dont see what the problem is with this movie, 2.3 is very poor when i enjoyed this movie alot and i think ben affleck and jennifer lopez where a good team together in this movie
can somebody please explain to me if you saw it, what is so bad about it, i thought it was an all round feel good movie and nothing wrong with it at all, the kid with brain damage in it was a lovable character too and worked well for the movie (no homo)
Gigli
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Gigli
by anonymous99 » Oct 26th, '06, 23:29
anonymous99
a positive anything is better than a negative nothin - Big Proof
http://www.bigproof4ever.com
http://www.myspace.com/intrinzik
a positive anything is better than a negative nothin - Big Proof
http://www.bigproof4ever.com
http://www.myspace.com/intrinzik
- anonymous99
- Soldier
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Sep 13th, '06, 13:10
Re: Gigli
by Slimm » Oct 27th, '06, 01:11
anonymous99 wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299930/
i dont see what the problem is with this movie, 2.3 is very poor when i enjoyed this movie alot and i think ben affleck and jennifer lopez where a good team together in this movie
can somebody please explain to me if you saw it, what is so bad about it, i thought it was an all round feel good movie and nothing wrong with it at all, the kid with brain damage in it was a lovable character too and worked well for the movie (no homo)
Didnt saw it but everything with J.Lo's ass is good
w o r l d p o l i c e a n d f r i e n d l y f i r e w o r l d p o l i c e a n d f r i e n d l y f i r e w o r l d p o l i c e a n d f r i e n d l y f i r e w o r l d p o l ic
- Slimm
- Band Leader
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Jul 20th, '05, 21:54
- Location: The Netherlands
- Gender: Male
Re: Gigli
by Inches » Oct 27th, '06, 02:01
Slimm wrote:anonymous99 wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299930/
i dont see what the problem is with this movie, 2.3 is very poor when i enjoyed this movie alot and i think ben affleck and jennifer lopez where a good team together in this movie
can somebody please explain to me if you saw it, what is so bad about it, i thought it was an all round feel good movie and nothing wrong with it at all, the kid with brain damage in it was a lovable character too and worked well for the movie (no homo)
Didnt saw it but everything with J.Lo's ass is good
exactlyy
-
Inches - Renegade
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Aug 11th, '06, 03:14
- Location: SS PoCo
by AspirinE » Oct 27th, '06, 05:46
most of the voters are movie freaks.
They dont want to embrace a concept of a film that has really no artistic value...
its just that type of film u watch to have a good time, just watching something nice, that on gives u pleasant emotions.
They dont want to embrace a concept of a film that has really no artistic value...
its just that type of film u watch to have a good time, just watching something nice, that on gives u pleasant emotions.
-
AspirinE - Django
- Posts: 20230
- Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
- Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
- Gender: Male
by anonymous99 » Oct 28th, '06, 13:42
Brihfl wrote:All I know is Al Pacino was in this movie, how could it be that bad?!
not in it for long at all
ASP wrote:most of the voters are movie freaks.
They dont want to embrace a concept of a film that has really no artistic value...
its just that type of film u watch to have a good time, just watching something nice, that on gives u pleasant emotions.
yeah i guess your right, tight avatar too, dodgeball is hillarious, chuck norris, hahahahahahaha
- anonymous99
- Soldier
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Sep 13th, '06, 13:10
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]