The TRshady Forum became read-only in December 2014. The 10 year history will live on, in this archive.
Continue the discussion with the new home for the Eminem and Hip Hop discussion: HipHopShelter.com.

AUG/29- Iran's leader calls for TV debate with Bush

Post and have discussions on the latest news from around the world.

AUG/29- Iran's leader calls for TV debate with Bush

Postby AspirinE » Aug 29th, '06, 19:25

EHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called on U.S. President George W. Bush to participate in a "direct television debate with us," so Iran can voice its point of view on how to end world predicaments.

"But the condition is that there can be no censorship, especially for the American nation," he said Tuesday.

The White House called the offer to debate Bush a "diversion" from international concerns over Iran's nuclear program, Reuters reported.

During during a news conference in Tehran, Ahmadinejad also blamed "special concessions" granted to the United States and Britain as "the root cause of all the problems in the world."

"At the Security Council, where they have to protect security, they enjoy the veto right. If anybody confronts them, there is no place to take complaints to."

His comments came two days before a deadline set by a U.N. Security Council resolution for the Islamic republic to suspend uranium enrichment or face possible sanctions.

Although he did not directly address the U.N. deadline, Ahmadinejad said '"nobody can prevent" Iran from its right to a "peaceful, nuclear program."

"I think the time has passed to speak of the Security Council and the tools they can use to force a country to do certain things," he said.

Ahmadinejad said he would reject any suspension of enrichment, even if requested by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan during an upcoming visit to Iran. (Full story)

Iran has until Thursday to agree to halt the enrichment program, which Tehran maintains is part of a civilian nuclear program to generate power.

Western nations accuse Iran of seeking to master technology to produce nuclear weapons.

The U.N. Security Council resolution, approved on July 31, would pave the way for the Tehran regime -- if it complies -- to receive financial incentives.

The United States has also held out the possibility of resuming direct contacts with Iran, more than 25 years after the two countries broke off diplomatic relations.

Last week, Tehran offered to resume negotiations about its nuclear program but did agree to halt uranium enrichment before any talks take place. (Full story)

If the Iranians do not accept the U.N.'s incentives offer by Thursday, the Security Council will discuss a resolution proposing economic sanctions on Iran.

While such a move is backed by three of the council's permanent members -- the United States, Britain and France -- the two others, Russia and China, have been cool to the idea and could use their veto to block a sanctions resolution.

Meanwhile, a senior Iranian official on Tuesday invited Western companies to bid for tenders to build nuclear plants, The Associated Press reported from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

"We have had ... another 21 thousand megawatts of nuclear power plants approved by the parliament that will be built in the next 20 years," Seyed Ala'addin Barojerdi, chairman of Iran's Parliament National Security and Foreign Affairs Commission, was quoted as saying.

"(The) international tenders for building of two of these nuclear power plants have been so far presented and we would be willing to see the Western companies participate in these projects," he said.

Western nations have been closing watching developments in Iran's nuclear program for signs of compliance. In recent days, Tehran has made public displays of new technologies and facilities.

On Sunday, state television reported that Iran test fired a long-range, radar-evading missile from a submarine in the Gulf as part of war games that began earlier this month. (Full story)

Some analysts interpreted the test and war games as thinly veiled threats that Iran could disrupt vital oil shipping lanes if pushed by an escalation in the nuclear dispute, according to Reuters.

A day earlier, Ahmadinejad officially opened a heavy-water production plant that he said would serve medical, agricultural and scientific needs. (Full story)

Video broadcast on Iranian television showed the president touring the plant in the central Iran city of Arak along with Gholamreza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization.

Heavy water is used in preparing uranium for nuclear weapons, but it is also useful for medical purposes, such as nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, according to Reuters.

"No one can deprive a nation of its rights based on its capabilities," the agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying in his speech to inaugurate the project.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/08/ ... index.html
User avatar
AspirinE
Django
Django
 
Posts: 20230
Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
Gender: Male

Postby katastrophe » Aug 29th, '06, 23:35

that would be an interesting debate with a lot of different views. it would definetly be a good one to watch. propz for the news ASP
Image

^^^Propz to McMaybe :worship:
User avatar
katastrophe
Under The Influence
Under The Influence
 
Posts: 4981
Joined: May 24th, '05, 04:20
Location: wherever my computer is located
Gender: Male

Postby AspirinE » Aug 29th, '06, 23:40

katastrophe wrote:that would be an interesting debate with a lot of different views. it would definetly be a good one to watch. propz for the news ASP


Too bad the poor monkey bush doesnt debate and this shit wont happen. God forbid that someone might hear a positive view on iran.
User avatar
AspirinE
Django
Django
 
Posts: 20230
Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
Gender: Male

Postby katastrophe » Aug 30th, '06, 00:01

ASP wrote:
katastrophe wrote:that would be an interesting debate with a lot of different views. it would definetly be a good one to watch. propz for the news ASP


Too bad the poor monkey bush doesnt debate and this shit wont happen. God forbid that someone might hear a positive view on iran.


in the words of eminem "Bush is pussy? why the fuck u think his names Bush? Pus is bushy"

bush sucks ass and he is the worst president we have had in a long time.

i dont have a problem with Iran..i just have a problem with Iran hating the United States and wanting to get revenge on us by nuking us hard :sweating:
Image

^^^Propz to McMaybe :worship:
User avatar
katastrophe
Under The Influence
Under The Influence
 
Posts: 4981
Joined: May 24th, '05, 04:20
Location: wherever my computer is located
Gender: Male

Postby AspirinE » Aug 30th, '06, 00:27

katastrophe wrote:
ASP wrote:
katastrophe wrote:that would be an interesting debate with a lot of different views. it would definetly be a good one to watch. propz for the news ASP


Too bad the poor monkey bush doesnt debate and this shit wont happen. God forbid that someone might hear a positive view on iran.


in the words of eminem "Bush is pussy? why the fuck u think his names Bush? Pus is bushy"

bush sucks ass and he is the worst president we have had in a long time.

i dont have a problem with Iran..i just have a problem with Iran hating the United States and wanting to get revenge on us by nuking us hard :sweating:


Iran doesnt want to nuke u, neither does korea, iraq or whoever.

America is in the middle east slaughtering people, wat do u expect them to do? love you?
User avatar
AspirinE
Django
Django
 
Posts: 20230
Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
Gender: Male

Postby katastrophe » Aug 30th, '06, 03:36

ASP wrote:Iran doesnt want to nuke u, neither does korea, iraq or whoever.

America is in the middle east slaughtering people, wat do u expect them to do? love you?


i hope ur right that they dont want to nuke us but when we get threats from iran, venezuela, and north korea about how they hate us and they want "death to the United States" its kinda hard to think that they wont nuke us.


i agree that america has no reason to be in iraq or to stick their nose in the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel...100% agree with u on that. i dont expect them to love us but i expect them to not threaten us with nukes.
Image

^^^Propz to McMaybe :worship:
User avatar
katastrophe
Under The Influence
Under The Influence
 
Posts: 4981
Joined: May 24th, '05, 04:20
Location: wherever my computer is located
Gender: Male

Postby AspirinE » Aug 30th, '06, 14:07

Sarah wrote:^If it wasn't for Bush I doubt Americans would be in Iran killing them. I mean...okay we hate on people like terrorists for killing people and destroying buildings and so on.....but we can't expect them to not hate us when we're doing the same thing to them


Sarah, americans arent in Iran yet. :p
User avatar
AspirinE
Django
Django
 
Posts: 20230
Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
Gender: Male

Postby AspirinE » Aug 30th, '06, 14:59

Sarah wrote::confusion: :oops: oops



Damn well.....fuck you quoted me :'( lol

umm....
ASP wrote:America is in the middle east slaughtering people, wat do u expect them to do? love you?

:devil:


middle east is a group of countries, it doesnt have to be iran. :smoking:
User avatar
AspirinE
Django
Django
 
Posts: 20230
Joined: Jun 4th, '05, 11:00
Location: Russia - Novosibirsk.
Gender: Male


Return to General News



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users