Justice not deserved.

[AspirinE]

Do u any of rember this law about how a layer can not disclose the confessions made to him by the person being prosecuted? Lets say there is a murdered on trial and he confeses to his layer clearly stating to him that he murdered the person, and yet they are fighting for his freedome, so called "justice". Am i the only one who sees a wrong in that. Im sure this prolly has happened quote a lot of times, especially in cases were rich people can get themselves a great layer. It just gives me the shivers wen im thinking about it.

I think that if the person is actually not guilty and is stating the truth then he has nuthing to fear of of, he should be able to tell his story as it was, and his layer must actually share his view on the situation, coz other wise he isnt fighting for justice, but infact is protecting injustice.

[Curious]

Do u any of rember this law about how a layer can not disclose the confessions made to him by the person being prosecuted? Lets say there is a murdered on trial and he confeses to his layer clearly stating to him that he murdered the person, and yet they are fighting for his freedome, so called "justice". Am i the only one who sees a wrong in that. Im sure this prolly has happened quote a lot of times, especially in cases were rich people can get themselves a great layer. It just gives me the shivers wen im thinking about it.

I think that if the person is actually not guilty and is stating the truth then he has nuthing to fear of of, he should be able to tell his story as it was, and his layer must actually share his view on the situation, coz other wise he isnt fighting for justice, but infact is protecting injustice.

I agree with you Asp, it doesn't seem like justice to protect a guilty person - besides I always wondered how lawyers can live with themselves if they get someone they know is guilty acquitted for murder or rape or whatever on a technicality or just because they are better at sweet-talking the jury than the prosecution. How can you sleep at night having something like that on your conscience?

[Ivy]

I think it's ridiculous....I don't see why a serial murderer or a serial rapist can admit to their lawyer..."Yeah...I killed all those little boys after sexually torturing them for several hours...and I also cut off their penis's for a suvenier.."....and the lawyer can't say shit...it's just like a fucking priest having to disclose evidence..it's like a guy in South Carolina, US...his name was Pee Wee Gaskins...he murdered over 150 women (that they knew of) and sexually tortured and raped all of them...he told his lawyer..and the lawyer defended his ass!!!!!!!!!!!....and fought for his "freedom"....he was found guilty but that's besides the point...if someone murdered my father or someone I know for that matter..and they confess it to their lawyer...I want them to be able to throw that bastard behind bars..not defend him...but that's part of their so called "rights".......it's pathetic, ridiculous...and I don't agree with it one bit...

[Mc Cubz]

yeye everyone right so far. I think everyone is entitled to a defence (which is the current law) but I dont agree that a lawyer is able to lie when aware of what the man/woman has done. I know a few layers cos I was considerin doing law at university so I had lots of work experience; the general idea was that some lawyers take their job as a career and value their reputation more than justice in society; also it can be a good challange if they attempt to get someone off who is guilty.

[ines]

your innocense as long as your guilt is not proved