Oh sorry, when I read it I thought it was in reference to my posts here.
And I saw it in a sarcastic tone sort of in this light...
"Do you actually have any ideas of your own or are you only capable of re-saying their shit"
In terms of my BOOK, didn't know you were on about that, I apologize
Um, yes I believe it will bring something new because as I said... I've only partially read Dawkins' book.
I purposely stopped reading it half-way through and haven't read any other main books on it for that very reason. I don't want to, even subconsciously re-write their ideas.
There's no point in bringing out a cheap knock-off.
But despite not reading their books fully, I'm obviously totally aware of almost all their views anyway. But my book will hopefully delve a lot deeper than their's have. I'm very obsessive and believe me, this thing is turning into a mountain and there's so many elements of religion and its origin / possible point or detriment to humanity that they haven't touched on.
I'm very conscious of being original of course. There's no point in writing it otherwise.
I want to make this book the be-all and end-all lmao. As arrogant as that sounds, that's my aspiration for it and I'm going to try my best to achieve that. Dawkins' went pretty deep into the logical side of it and Hitchens went pretty deep into the moral and political sides of it.
I'm going more specifically into the psychology, history and other. Trust me, it'll be different

Dawkins is obviously a scientist so he's very... Maticulous and... Pin-point in his arguments. As for Hitchens, he's also a rational guy and uses scientific arguments too but his arguments are usually very... Personally-tainted slants on religion's detriment and history to humanity.
I'm just writing what comes naturally to me, I don't find writing hard. All I find hard is arranging it as I go off on 100 tangents and trying to organise and stick to topic per topic gets messy.
But just self-judging on my own writing on it so far... I don't think it particularly sounds like any of them. If I had to summize it I'd say it's Dawkins meets Hitchens meets... Derren Brown. Lmao. I like to stress points until I... Exhaust myself, until I feel I've reached my capacity on that point. For then.
But much like Em when he kept scrapping music because it didn't feel 'current enough', I have this obsessive... Almost irrational impulse lol. I keep scrapping and re-writing everything... Even... Seriously (and no ego involed) but, very well written pages upon pages. Because I feel like I can update, better and progress my thoughts.
As I read it, it doesn't feel 'new' enough. This is a constant problem of course lmao, especially when I want to go and get published and I may keep changing and updating it.