^^ I understand your point, and I'm glad you said that. But when you take into account all the facts about "how" the towers collapsed, and why they supposedly collapsed. The fact they did so in 56 and 73 minutes is something that can't be looked at as something you would expect right?
What I'm trying to say is, sometimes I feel simple things need to be looked at with some common sense also, just ignore science for a moment all together. Two buildings made to withstand airplanes bigger than those that hit it, with fires caused by jet fuel we know was never hot enough to melt steel, that they then both collapsed in such a short time? That in itself I feel, any person who looks at just that, disregarding all other knowledge, and without a prenotioned bias, would say that does not make sense, or seems to be near impossible.
It's the same thing I like to say about the towers after they collapsed. Everything in the buildings were turned to dust. If the floors collapsed onto each other, creating a pancake effect, how would each floor and the cement they were, all turn to dust? That idea, and fact, I feel when looked at unbiasly cannot be seen as something that you can make sense of, and because of that, is something you should see as being wrong. How could it all turn to dust? Especially when it was a fire and not explosives that the report spoke of.
I feel that there are a lot of simple things that need to be looked at with common sense. I understand that everyone has their own opinion, what bothers me is that people let their opinions sway what seems to be common sense at times.
I guess I'm saying, think about those two things, and if in any way they logically make sense to you.
Edit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezIU6ZxY ... re=relatedwatch and hear what an MIT professor concluded
