Spyder wrote:FAL movie sucked balls wtf haha.
johnny depp as a balding drug addict playing in a movie where he is just toke'd off his ass wandering around vegas
does not a movie make.
however i do want to see the rum diary. is that by the same writer?
if so wtf is with these guys over-using the same actors
jesus idk if tim burton has used anyone BUT johnny for everything, i think hes used him for female character lol
Hmmm...
Well, I guess we're all entitled to our own opinion. Of course, I don't agree with yours, but that's not all that important. I'll address some of your points though.
Johnny Depp is playing Hunter S. Thompson (as Raoul Duke) during the time that Fear & Loathing was being written. The movie itself is trying to capture the feeling of the writing. Sometimes it succeeds, sometimes it misses the mark. Overall, I would say it accomplishes its goal fairly well.
Depp's character--Hunter S. Thompson--isn't a drug addict. He's some one who uses copious amounts of various drugs, but nearly all of them are psychedelics or dissociative. Outside of the Cocaine and Amphetamine, the drugs used in the film aren't all that likely to get anyone addicted, they contribute to the out-of-control nature of the overall experience.
Oh, and toke'd out isn't the best description. He doesn't toke on anything, save for a cigarette, and that glass dick that he hits before he writes some of the best passages of his entire career. Semantics, I know, but I think it's important to be accurate when you're derailing a work that's held in fairly high regard by a decent number of people.
The Rum Diary may be more up your alley. It's a slower movie, all around, but it's definitely more accessible for the masses. The reason Johnny Depp is used (again) is because he plays Hunter S. Thompson well. He looks like Thompson, speaks like Thompson, and knew the man well before he blew his brains out all over his typewriter.
Paul Kemp is not the same character as Raoul Duke, per se, but both characters are based very closely on Hunter S. Thompson. The difference is that Paul Kemp was the name of the protagonist in The Rum Diary, which is a novel Hunter wrote before he became a famous journalist. Raoul Duke is more of an alias, used to protect himself at the time when he was involved in all of this illegal activity. Both are essentially Thompson himself. It only makes sense to have Depp portray him in the new movie.
Both movies are worth a watch. Fear & Loathing was representative of HST's writing style at a particular time. So is The Rum Diary. The difference is that The Rum Diary was before Thompson really found his voice, and that is the way it is portrayed in the movie. So while F&L is more scatter-brained and non-linear, it offers brief moments of profound insight that aren't really there in The Rum Diary.
The HST that wrote Fear & Loathing would not have existed if not for the time he spent in Puerto Rico, which is when he wrote the Rum Diary. However, had Fear & Loathing not cemented his status as, a poster boy for Freak Power, The Rum Diary would have never seen the light of day.
Anyway, I like both movies.
