Hesky wrote:Block wrote:Everyone's got an excuse for Why the US made it out. How is it just on paper, though, if Germany and Portugal are numbers 1 and 2 to win the cup? It's a chess match.
Who the heck had Portugal as 2nd favourites to win the World Cup?

Anyone? They barely even qualified for the tournament.
It was a tough group on paper; Germany haven't been the force people thought they would be thus far, Ghana were incredibly unlucky, and Portugal were the one man dependent squad the vast majority predicted they'd be. It isn't really excuses, it's facts. Ghana dominated the US in their match in terms of shots and possession, and they did the same against Germany, minus the possession. With a bit more luck, they could have had 6 points from those 2 matches. A 10 man Portugal side were trounced against Germany, which allowed for the gap in goal difference that sent the US through. The 1 shot they had on target throughout the entire match against Germany today can't exactly be filling them with confidence for the knock out stage, but at least they're more battle tested than the Belgium side they'll be facing on Tuesday.
Before the US vs Portugal match, after Spain was eliminated, Portugal was the number 2 pick. With Germany as number 1. This, of course, is subjective. However, many sports analysts agreed.
As for a "one man team," I disagree. Just because Ronaldo is.. well.. Ronaldo.. doesn't mean Nani should be overlooked. Or even Moutinho, for that matter.
I'm not arguing against the statistics. I said plenty of times that the US team is a WIP. But it isn't just dumb luck that brought them this far...
On a personal note, I don't believe that playing for an 'established club' really matters, in terms of credentials. Not if you can beat them...