Ask classthe_king a Question Thread

[Master Chief]

Concession accepted?

(? is there because I'm not sure if I'm using it right).

1.5 MC - 0 Satire. Now, we can go back to being BFFs

[Satire]

Concession accepted?

(? is there because I'm not sure if I'm using it right).

1.5 MC - 0 Satire. Now, we can go back to being BFFs

My side of the argument was to convince you into not getting into the semantics argument.

Conceding actually leads into my own success.

It's a paradox really.

[Master Chief]

Concession accepted?

(? is there because I'm not sure if I'm using it right).

1.5 MC - 0 Satire. Now, we can go back to being BFFs

My side of the argument was to convince you into not getting into the semantics argument.

Conceding actually leads into my own success.

It's a paradox really.

You failed to explain what you meant in takeover by not bringing up the quote. Therefore, you lose.

[Satire]

You failed to explain what you meant in takeover by not bringing up the quote. Therefore, you lose.

Yeah but I was trying not to. So I succeeded in what I was trying to do.

[Master Chief]

You failed to explain what you meant in takeover by not bringing up the quote. Therefore, you lose.

Yeah but I was trying not to. So I succeeded in what I was trying to do.

For you = success.

For the argument = fail.

I think it's official, guys. It's now 1.5 to 0.

Damn

[Satire]

You failed to explain what you meant in takeover by not bringing up the quote. Therefore, you lose.

Yeah but I was trying not to. So I succeeded in what I was trying to do.

For you = success.

For the argument = fail.

I think it's official, guys. It's now 1.5 to 0.

Damn

But the point of my argument was to not go into the argument. So really, I chalk this up as a personal win either way.

And Lose Yourself sucks, so that doesn't count either.

2 - 0.

[Master Chief]

Stop. Just stop.

I clearly once again beat you but without richard or anyone to assist me. Please say the following: "I concede".

[Satire]

Stop. Just stop.

I clearly once again beat you but without richard or anyone to assist me. Please say the following: "I concede".

I........
































































































































































































2-0.

[Master Chief]

And you can't chalk this up as a personal win because I made you argue with me for 6 pages over nonsense. So, I win. Do you really think this was a real argument from my side?

I win with a fake argument and I win because I annoyed AND I win because you ultimately failed your task of no arguing with me.

Win, win, win. Too much of it.

[Satire]

And you can't chalk this up as a personal win because I made you argue with me for 6 pages over nonsense. So, I win. Do you really think this was a real argument from my side?

I win with a fake argument and I win because I annoyed AND I win because you ultimately failed your task of no arguing with me.

Win, win, win. Too much of it.

So....you were trolling me?

[Master Chief]

Ummm... yeah lol.

Diction told you but you kept on going, rofl.

[Satire]

Ummm... yeah lol.

Diction told you but you kept on going, rofl.

you're trolling

Called it.

3-0.

[Master Chief]

Whole quote: "Diction says you're trolling".

So, you went by what diction told you but if you REALLY would've believed him you would've stopped arguing with me.

Ummm... I think that's a 2.5 - 0? Yeah, it is.

[Satire]

Whole quote: "Diction says you're trolling".

So, you went by what diction told you but if you REALLY would've believed him you would've stopped arguing with me.

Ummm... I think that's a 2.5 - 0? Yeah, it is.

I did believe him. Hence why I stopped responding with more than a sentence per argument.

So yeah, 3-0.

[Master Chief]

A few pages after that quote behold...

Are you stupid or just really bad at this? Serious question.

I can't be that bad if I won again, can I?

Except you are, because you dwindled on semantics (and lost at that by "concession", so even if this 'it's not going to be big' argument existed, we would have won completely different arguments, but that's not how a fucking debate works), and then started arguing a claim that I haven't been trying to make or defend since the idea actually started taking off.

That's like me claiming that your posts are retarded because they're not longer than mine. Obviously you would admit that, but that's not concession or me winning, because that's not the point or intention of your posts in the first place. It's completely random and missing the basis.

This is why trying to kick off discussion by arguing semantics is pitiful and pointless, the argument leads nowhere.

Shut up, hoe. 3.5 - 0.