So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

by **moose35** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:27

I think it is. It got leaked on "paul's website", nothing else from the album was leaked, so this was an official leak. You think it'll be the official 2nd single?

by **Almostlity** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:28

I don't think so, they would've mentioned it.

by **HereHere** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:30

Way too much swearing on it to get any radio play I'd guess. So I can't see it being another single.

by **Devil'sAdvocate** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:35

Nope.

by **moose35** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:38

Why would they leak it then?

by **Pllumi** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:38

HereHere wrote:Way too much swearing on it to get any radio play I'd guess. So I can't see it being another single.

by **AJS2050** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:43

I would have thought it would've been premiered on the radio if it was the 2nd single & on em's twitter.

by **Ethernet** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:45

AJS2050 wrote:I would have thought it would've been premiered on the radio if it was the 2nd single & on em's twitter.

This.

by **HereHere** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:49

moose35 wrote:Why would they leak it then?

Probably to add hype, which it did the opposite.

by **3110** » Jun 4th, '10, 11:59

And I think you can hear the beginning of the next song at the end and you wouldn´t if that was a single.

by **forgot_about_matt** » Jun 4th, '10, 16:10

moose35 wrote:I think it is. It got leaked on "paul's website", nothing else from the album was leaked, so this was an official leak. You think it'll be the official 2nd single?

No. It wouldn't get any radio play. Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if it's left off the clean version of the abum (or at least has lyics changed). Em's using more profanity than ever. I think it's a street single.

by **itsfrazier** » Jun 4th, '10, 16:25

are u guys not forgetting 3 a.m. or superman? lots of swearing, and 3 a.m. was about killing people and he did a freakin video for it!! i'd say anything can happen but for some reason i dont think he really cares about radio anymore.

by **Wisheezy** » Jun 4th, '10, 16:27

HereHere wrote:
moose35 wrote:Why would they leak it then?

Probably to add hype, which it did the opposite.

^^+1

by **biglurch** » Jun 4th, '10, 17:05

HereHere wrote:
moose35 wrote:Why would they leak it then?

Probably to add hype, which it did the opposite.

i think they leaked it to show recovery wont just be songs like not afraid, because i know people want that crazy em aswell

by **Drucifer** » Jun 4th, '10, 17:09

I'm pretty sure that wont be the 2nd single, I think paul R just saw all the people online thinking the duet with pink would be a pop love song, so leaked it to say "Shut the fuck up"

So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Re: So is Won't Back Down the 2nd single?

Who is online