doris wrote:Well, GUESS AGAIN.
I didn't download any of leaked tracks and never heard them. And I won't download them.
So I guess I'm not ungrateful fan after all.
Congrats. What do you want, a medal?
doris wrote:Well, GUESS AGAIN.
I didn't download any of leaked tracks and never heard them. And I won't download them.
So I guess I'm not ungrateful fan after all.
Wreckless Music wrote:Why would the CIA come after him in Saudia Arabia for leaking songs? They're just songs. He didn't kill anybody. Yes it is breaking the law I'm sure but it happens all the time.
Wreckless Music wrote:They're just songs
Back.Again wrote:Wreckless Music wrote:Why would the CIA come after him in Saudia Arabia for leaking songs? They're just songs. He didn't kill anybody. Yes it is breaking the law I'm sure but it happens all the time.
Over seventy-five websites were shut down in the name of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); the 1998 amendment that brought the United States Copyright Act into the digital age. The sites run the gamut from shopping to BitTorrent downloading, but two members of the New Music Cartel; OnSmash.com, DaJaz1.com, and RapGodfathers.com have been garnering much of the attention. These sites have a reputation for promoting new music and artists, and featuring exclusive videos, but apparently ICE has a different idea.
What did you say?Wreckless Music wrote:They're just songs
They're just in jail.
Well, do the math, if you know that each Eminem song can get you over, I don't know, 250.000$ (?) (single, promo, album sales, iTunes, ...), Koolo has, that's what he said, probably not, but c'mon, 40 tracks? Well you can do the math for me.
Maybe not the CIA, but being from Europe, I don't know much about the police in the USA, so I said CIA.
xxTrigger1989xx wrote:America has little to no jurisdiction in Saudi Arabia
Fail on the people thinking Koolo will get in trouble. The guy who SOLD the tracks to him is gonna get in trouble, Koolo bought them fair and squaree
Back.Again wrote:xxTrigger1989xx wrote:America has little to no jurisdiction in Saudi Arabia
Fail on the people thinking Koolo will get in trouble. The guy who SOLD the tracks to him is gonna get in trouble, Koolo bought them fair and squaree
How the hell will you find the person who sold the track to Koolo, without asking it to Koolo?
Asking to Koolo = Trouble for Koolo.
I mean, he released the tracks, made the track public. He made a big fault. And all faults that caused damages are taken in consideration. Just as an example, to make it clear: You sell me an illegal gun. I shoot and hurt a guy with that gun. Who's fault is it? With your statement, it's your fault, and I'm free as air. Isn't there something not right?
So in a way or another, there will be trouble for Koolo.
xxTrigger1989xx wrote:So, other people who leak tracks SHOULDN'T get in trouble, the guy who leaked Recovery early SHOULDN'T get in trouble for it, but Koolo should when he BOUGHT the motherfucking songs? If Koolo should get in trouble, then every leaker should get in trouble, and America has enough to worry about than people leaking fucking music. GTFO
BawlTikki wrote:toxicbuffy wrote:lol @ all you people
![]()
Let me motorboat your titties buffy.
HereHere wrote:BawlTikki wrote:toxicbuffy wrote:lol @ all you people
![]()
Let me motorboat your titties buffy.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]