EminemBase wrote:Anything not produced by Dre, was not Relapse 2 material.
I thought Alchemist and Mr Porter were involved to. Some people are saying that 2010 Westwood freestyle was from Relapse 2.
EminemBase wrote:Anything not produced by Dre, was not Relapse 2 material.
InsaneTRex94 wrote:MikeNUFC wrote:It's pretty simple.
He made a few albums worth of Relapse type songs. Planned to release 2 Relapse albums
Released Relapse
Had a few recording sessions, , including Hawaii session (On Fire, So Bad etc), and met with other producers
Decided to not release Relapse 2 and make Recovery (few songs already made in that direction)
Released an EP (Refill) of some R2 songs to tide fans over
Released Recovery
Done.
Well he recorded in 2010 for Recovery as well, otherwise it wouldn't have come out in June, it woulda come out much earlier.
Fleka wrote:Mr. Eminem, please descent down from your rap throne among us simple posters, and clear this matter for us: WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED WITH RELAPSE 2!!??
Fleka wrote:Mr. Eminem, please descent down from your rap throne among us simple posters, and clear this matter for us: WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED WITH RELAPSE 2!!??
Mathers wrote:EminemBase wrote:Anything not produced by Dre, was not Relapse 2 material.
I thought Alchemist and Mr Porter were involved to. Some people are saying that 2010 Westwood freestyle was from Relapse 2.
EminemBase wrote:Mathers wrote:EminemBase wrote:Anything not produced by Dre, was not Relapse 2 material.
I thought Alchemist and Mr Porter were involved to. Some people are saying that 2010 Westwood freestyle was from Relapse 2.
I think that's probably true (about that freestyle verse being from Relapse 2).
Which is why it annoys me so much. Because between that verse and "Buffalo Bill"...
I'm sure it would have been a classic to me, or at least had... AMAZING material.
Solace wrote:Okay guys can we get something cleared up here? People say he changed directions while recording R2 (which came songs like On Fire & Cocaine POSSIBLY) and eventually it changed so much that he decided to scrap the idea of Relapse 2 and move onto Recovery. Now why oh why would he change directions while recording Relapse 2 when Relapse 2 was just supposed to be songs from the same 2008-2009 sessions that Relapse 1 came from? There was no change in direction, Relapse 2 was already recorded! The entire point of Relapse 2 was to bring more music for the fans from the sessions that Relapse 1 came from. He obviously planned to cancel Relapse 2 so that he could record a new album, and planned to never release a second Relapse.
Or am I missing some crucial point?
Geno wrote:cheeseburger wrote:Okay. So lets say I agree that there is a Relapse 2. Then it IS coming out at some point. Otherwise he would burn it.
However Im doubting its as good as they say it is.
It won't be released for a long, long time as Em said "fuck my last CD (Relapse) that shit's in my trash".
If he released it the average, casual, radio fan would be like "Wtf? Why's he releasing an album he thinks is trash? What a sell out"
Mathers wrote:Geno wrote:cheeseburger wrote:Okay. So lets say I agree that there is a Relapse 2. Then it IS coming out at some point. Otherwise he would burn it.
However Im doubting its as good as they say it is.
It won't be released for a long, long time as Em said "fuck my last CD (Relapse) that shit's in my trash".
If he released it the average, casual, radio fan would be like "Wtf? Why's he releasing an album he thinks is trash? What a sell out"
Then he defended Relapse on Reunion.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]