Menzo wrote:StayWideAwake wrote:Insidious91 wrote:
It's funny because I used to be a huge stan. But ever since Relapse I've been gradually loosing my appeal of Eminem. It's probably because I listen to so much hip hop that Eminem doesn't come close anymore to any of the rappers I currently listen to. That third verse is probably the best thing Eminem has done since Relapse though. IF he could keep that flow at the beginning of the third verse going throughout the whole song than I would rate it differently. 'Switching his flow' and 'flow being all over the place' is synonymous to me. Props for not attacking me like some of the angry posters on here who get their panties up in a bunch whenever they see a fellow poster who does not agree with them.
First off, there is a big difference between seamless, fluid flow switches as the beat changes, and being "all over the place". That has negative connotations like when a rapper struggles with riding a beat or attempts to switch flows on the fly and sounds sloppy. Both of those are far from what Em displayed here.
As far as people "getting their panties in a bunch when they see a fellow poster who does not agree with them":
It isn't the fact in itself that you disagree. It is your approach and delivery of the comment. If you want to try to tell me "overall shit song" was a sincere attempt to have your genuine opinion heard...I'm sorry but I call BS. That isn't articulating a critique, that's an insult. You knew damn well when you posted that that people wouldn't read it and say "Wow. How insightful".
Apparently he can diss you but if someone else does it, it's getting their panties in a bunch. How can you not appreciate switch of flow if you're a fan of EmInsidiot.
StayWideAwake wrote:Insidious91 wrote:So saying you had a shitty opinion makes me have my panties up in a bunch? I suppose the truth hurts, lol.
Where in my post did I say you "had your panties in a bunch"?
Or was it "subliminally implied" lol
Menzo wrote:SWA, apparently his reading comprehension is as laughable as his posts.
Insidious91 wrote:Menzo wrote:SWA, apparently his reading comprehension is as laughable as his posts.
StayWideAwake wrote:
This is just ridiculous now haha
If you want to be taken seriously, articulate yourself.
If you don't, and you'd rather wrap up a review as "overall shit", then don't get upset when no one takes you seriously. It really is that simple. No one is mad. You just have nothing to say.
StayWideAwake wrote:Let me get this straight. He calls you out on the fact that you have nothing important to say in your posts... and that you misread my comment...and you say HE is "butthurt"? Once again, if you did in fact have anything to say...you wouldn't have resorted to some stupid picture that makes no contextual sense.
StayWideAwake wrote:Insidious91 wrote:StayWideAwake wrote:
This is just ridiculous now haha
If you want to be taken seriously, articulate yourself.
If you don't, and you'd rather wrap up a review as "overall shit", then don't get upset when no one takes you seriously. It really is that simple. No one is mad. You just have nothing to say.
Just to be clear, I wasn't take shots at you with that subliminal panties up in a bunch line. And perhaps I jumped the gun a bit by saying you had a shitty opinion because of your original sarcastic post. So I apologize for that. I was mainly going at the posters *cough* Menzo* cough who called people piece of shits and pussies for the dumbest reasons.
I'm not going to tell Menzo what he can and can't say, particularly because he seems to more often than not be on the side of reason...despite the harsh nature of some of the things he says to people being negative. But as long as you just write normal posts, all is well with me.
Menzo wrote:Insidious91 wrote:I love you too, Menzo
I love you too brother.
SajN wrote:Menzo wrote:Insidious91 wrote:I love you too, Menzo
I love you too brother.
THAT is so gay I can barely say it with a straight face, looking boy
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]