When accused of being homophobic, his comeback reeks of ignorance: "Nah, you're just heterophobic".
How can someone miss the point that badly? I mean really? They literally explained why that lines clever (accusations of him being homophobic were ignorant and stupid, so he'll just respong ignorantly and stupidly) yet they criticised it for that exact reason.
I dont know how the reviewer can call himself a human being.