CrashBand wrote:@Embase. Yeah but the people who it appeals to aren't all like that. You're the one generalizing now.
No, I'm not generalizing. I'm saying, the music of which Hopsin is referring to is only going to appeal to certain people by definition; which it does. Are you saying it's appealing to everybody or has the potential to 'brainwash' anybody?
People have different intelligence levels, taste, ideals, values; perception of other people, moral standard, background etc. etc. etc. ; now, no 'one' particular combination of any of these things can be said to be 'the' appealing body (although analysis / arguments could be made) but my point is; the lowly of the low kind of rap Hopsin is referring to does NOT appeal to all or 'change' people's taste to liking it. You have to like it, to like it.
Know why I don't listen to it? because I don't like it. Of course you have to be exposed to something to know whether you like it or not, I'm not saying the people are like the rappers in terms of actions or morals (you don't have to agree with art to like it either), I'm saying they were inherently susceptible to liking what they like. You can't choose what you
like.
CrashBand wrote:You are implying that for the 'brainwashing' or as you put it 'appealing' to have an affect on people, they must already be like that to an extent.
Of course to like something you have to already be of a similar mind or have something about you that coincides with liking X thing, internally. Taste is a knee-jerk reaction to what you're exposed to: you can consciously re-define and explain and analyze what you like and why, but you can't choose what you like, or what you and your mental build up inherently prefer.
There's reasons certain people like certain things; and it may even be as simple as somebody liking a melody; some people like fast melodies, slow melodies; some people like big, rich, constructed music; some people like very simplistic, broken down, sparse music... but these are internal reactions, not 'choices' of like or 'brainwashing'.
These shitty rappers couldn't 'brainwash' me in to liking them, because I inherently and internally feel a distaste the sound, and the ideas and raps were/are not intelligent or constructed enough to appeal to my
natural intellect. That's not my
choice, they didn't appeal to me, because they don't, you can't force it. You can't make somebody like something they 'wouldn't' like, makes no sense.
It's not because I consciously chose to fight back against brainwashing. So yes, you do have to like something, to like it. I can't make you like something you don't like, so Hopsin's argument is invalid and redundant; people will like what they like, taste is just a reflection of what sounds or looks favourable to your genetic mental structure; things which tickle your psychological fancy for reasons outside of your, or any shitty rapper on this planet's control.
There is not a brainwashing occurring; only an appealing to a stupid people, which has always and always will happen. American entertainment has in a sense got dumber in many areas; movies, music, all genres and kinds of mainstream representation has been broadened on every level - but again, this is a reflection, as you said. And that reflection is only going to appeal to people who inherently like that, or who are of the same mind or in the right mind to be drawn to, or like it. You can argue about art, you can debate why something is richer, more layered, more intelligent etc. but you can't logically convince somebody to inherently like the sound of something they wouldn't otherwise like or visa versa. That's knee-jerk, that's automatic.