Jaz wrote:Why address it? You've introduced no new points. You're just spewing the same bullshit over and over again. Meanwhile I drop a new piece of information that further backs up my point every time.
No, it addresses your stupid claim.
You say that I agreed the thread was pointless and then quoted me. Now, once again you're criminal of not reading things properly.
He said the thread was NOT pointless by definition but pointless by popular consensus. I said "Correct" to that breakdown. I agree with it. I agree that it's not pointless by definition but by popular consensus.
Two different things. You were arguing it was pointless by definition, hence you saying it was a "FACT" that it was pointless. To which I have clearly shown it's not.