Ask classthe_king a Question Thread

[Satire]

ISo, you're taking over something you created, the thread you made? Cool. And I meant the whole Eminem section anyways. The Eminem Section will not be something you control. I assume that's what you meant with takeover. I meant budge as in, this won't have any lasting impact/impact at all in the Em section.

Nice try at attempting to distort the meaning of my words used in MY context/intention.

You're actually distorting the meaning of my words used in my context considering you assumed I meant that I would take over the Eminem section. Your argument would hold grounds if

A.) The way I used the word wasn't obviously used in jest.
B.) I specified what I would be "taking over"

but it wasn't, and it didn't. I never claimed that I was taking over the Eminem section, in fact I never even claimed that this topic was going to be in the "Eminem section", you and diction did.

And yes, I am taking over something we created, hence my usage of the word "Take-Over", and my unnecessary explanation over why I used the word. You're arguing over semantics.

[Devil'sAdvocate]

So you're just playing a stupid semantical game because you're agitated that some of us are contemplating making a thread that isn't praising Eminem?

word,MC

if the thread will piss you off,just dont open it.

[VenomBlackViper]

Uhh gaiz why aren't we asking class questions?

[Master Chief]

So you're just playing a stupid semantical game because you're agitated that some of us are contemplating making a thread that isn't praising Eminem?

No.

I'm just saying that your plan is stupid, pointless and that a takeover will not be the result. I don't give a fuck if you don't like Eminem lol. I would prefer if you do, of course but at the end of the day, what do I care? I'm just saying that it's pretty stupid.

You're actually distorting the meaning of my words used in my context considering you assumed I meant that I would take over the Eminem section. Your argument would hold grounds if

A.) The way I used the word wasn't obviously used in jest.
B.) I specified what I would be "taking over"

but it wasn't, and it didn't. I never claimed that I was taking over the Eminem section, in fact I never even claimed that this topic was going to be in the "Eminem section", you and diction did.

And yes, I am taking over something we created, hence my usage of the word "Take-Over", and my unnecessary explanation over why I used the word. You're arguing over semantics.

In that case, you're "Take-Over" is even more pointless and even more retarded.

And again, I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF YOU HATE ON EMINEM. THE THREAD WILL NOT PISS ME OFF. WHY WOULD IT IF I ALREADY KNOW IT'S FABRICATED BEFOREHAND?

[Satire]

In that case, you're "Take-Over" is even more pointless and even more retarded.

No, it is properly used but you misinterpreted it and I explained why. Once again, you're trying to insult & debate semantics.

[classthe_king]

Just to throw this out there, I'm pretty sure Mike was made a true villain against his will. I've never seen him associate himself with any of them, I could be wrong though.

[Devil'sAdvocate]

if you really dont give a shit MC,you are doing a shit job showing that by telling them or implying to them not to make that lil ass thread.

im really just waiting for the back fourth between block and insider

and maybe the long awaited battle between diction and mike

[dead prez]

I'm just saying that your plan is stupid, pointless and that a takeover will not be the result. I don't give a fuck if you don't like Eminem lol. I would prefer if you do, of course but at the end of the day, what do I care? I'm just saying that it's pretty stupid.

I'm not going to play a "You Mad", but let's be honest, the only reason you ever want at him for something as arbitrary as his word choice (semantics) is because he's making a thread which you obviously don't like. And yes this is a fallacy (appeal to motive) before you try to accuse me of making one, if he didn't think about making that topic, you wouldn't have went at him for something as petty as his word choice.

[Master Chief]

In that case, you're "Take-Over" is even more pointless and even more retarded.

No, it is properly used but you misinterpreted it and I explained why. Once again, you're trying to insult & debate semantics.

It may be properly used but I'm just stating that you're supposed "Take-Over" is even stupider. You're essentially taking over your own thread. That's retarded.

[Satire]

In that case, you're "Take-Over" is even more pointless and even more retarded.

No, it is properly used but you misinterpreted it and I explained why. Once again, you're trying to insult & debate semantics.

It may be properly used but I'm just stating that you're supposed "Take-Over" is even stupider. You're essentially taking over your own thread. That's retarded.

It's subjective whether it's "Retarded" or not because of your implication of it and the fact that you took it so literally.

What's more retarded, me using a 4 letter word, or you typing paragraphs over why I shouldn't have used that word, and then admitting that it's properly used?

[Master Chief]

I'm not going to play a "You Mad", but let's be honest, the only reason you ever want at him for something as arbitrary as his word choice (semantics) is because he's making a thread which you obviously don't like. And yes this is a fallacy (appeal to motive) before you try to accuse me of making one, if he didn't think about making that topic, you wouldn't have went at him for something as petty as his word choice.

Or maybe, because I'm pointing out the obvious? Or maybe because "I felt like being an asshole". Like you did when you blatantly responded to my joke post and even divided it.

@DA, Show me a post where I told them not to make the thread. Or at the very least, implied that.

[Master Chief]

It's subjective whether it's "Retarded" or not because of your implication of it and the fact that you took it so literally.

What's more retarded, me using a 4 letter word, or you typing paragraphs over why I shouldn't have used that word, and then admitting that it's properly used?

I thought you meant takeover the Em section, I said you were wrong, you are using the word wrong That's not gonna happen. You said, that is not the case, you didn't mean that you were going to takeover THAT. I said, okay now you're using the word right but it goes back to the whole point that this whole plan is retarted because the only takeover that is going to take place in that of your own thread. THAT was what I was trying to prove, not the wrong usage of the word takeover.

[Devil'sAdvocate]

@MC,everything you wrote is you telling lilSfolife! that his takeover and thread will be stupid and lame,which gives me the idea that you are implying to them not to make the thread or start anything.

look at it this way,it gives this place an interesting couple of days with some fun back and fourth,chill bro

[dead prez]

Or maybe, because I'm pointing out the obvious? Or maybe because "I felt like being an asshole". Like you did when you blatantly responded to my joke post and even divided it.

@DA, Show me a post where I told them not to make the thread. Or at the very least, implied that.

What obvious? You went at him for semantics, since when did you like to play semantical games? Give it up you're not doing a good job hiding why you went at him in the first place, coupled with the "You're going to get raped by The Few True Villains", only further leads to my belief that you only went at him because he's making a thread which you don't like.

As far as me breaking down the posts, you could tell it was in jest, by me saying that Royce Da 5'9 get assfucked by Eminem, and Dessa is a cunt. So unless you're trolling right now, and don't really believe in what your saying, than that analogy failed miserably.

If you were going to be an argumentative asshole, you should have at least picked something less trivial to argue over instead of semantics, just a thought.

[Satire]

thought you meant takeover the Em section, I said you were wrong, you are using the word wrong That's not gonna happen. You said, that is not the case, you didn't mean that you were going to takeover THAT. I said, okay now you're using the word right but it goes back to the whole point that this whole plan is retarted because the only takeover that is going to take place in that of your own thread. THAT was what I was trying to prove, not the wrong usage of the word takeover.

You said to "Rephrase it" so yes, you were obviously claiming that I used the word in the wrong context.

And I'm fully aware that you think the word choice is "retarded", but why should that affect me considering it was used properly and expressed exactly what I wanted to say? The whole plan in general isn't to "takeover" anything, but I used that word to express the occurrence of the thread itself. It's the exact direction I wanted to imply, but you're trying to interpret it as broader.

You didn't prove anything except that YOU took the word too literally.