Ask classthe_king a Question Thread

[Master Chief]

What obvious? You went at him for semantics, since when did you like to play semantical games? Give it up you're not doing a good job hiding why you went at him in the first place, coupled with the "You're going to get raped by The Few True Villains", only further leads to my belief that you only went at him because he's making a thread which you don't like.

As far as me breaking down the posts, you could tell it was in jest, by me saying that Royce Da 5'9 get assfucked by Eminem, and Dessa is a cunt. So unless you're trolling right now, and don't really believe in what your saying, than that analogy failed miserably.

If you were going to be an argumentative asshole, you should have at least picked something less trivial to argue over instead of semantics, just a thought.

I took part in the fabricated Eminem only has One Good Album thread which insults Eminem to a huge extent. I said that about The Few True Villains because it's my opinion, just my 2 cents. Nothing wrong with that. I don't mind this thread, maybe I'll like it but I just stated that it will not cause a takeover of the Em section. Of course, later I would be told that he didn't mean takeover in that context bla bla bla but that's a different discussion.

I simply said that maybe I'm causing this argument and I picked on Satire's word choice/ambitions because I want to be an asshole. Nothing to complex there, buddy.

[Master Chief]

You said to "Rephrase it" so yes, you were obviously claiming that I used the word in the wrong context.

And I'm fully aware that you think the word choice is "retarded", but why should that affect me considering it was used properly and expressed exactly what I wanted to say? The whole plan in general isn't to "takeover" anything, but I used that word to express the occurrence of the thread itself. It's the exact direction I wanted to imply, but you're trying to interpret it as broader.

You didn't prove anything except that YOU took the word too literally.

Yes. I know that...

I already accepted your meaning of takeover in the context in which you had used it in that post. After saying that, I told you that the takeover you're planning to do is very minimal and unimpactful as opposed to IT vs Em.

Yeah, I took it too literally. But, the point in criticizing your word choice was too express how I think that this fabricated thread will not be something major.

[dead prez]

I took part in the fabricated Eminem only has One Good Album thread which insults Eminem to a huge extent. I said that about The Few True Villains because it's my opinion, just my 2 cents. Nothing wrong with that. I don't mind this thread, maybe I'll like it but I just stated that it will not cause a takeover of the Em section. Of course, later I would be told that he didn't mean takeover in that context bla bla bla but that's a different discussion.

I simply said that maybe I'm causing this argument and I picked on Satire's word choice/ambitions because I want to be an asshole. Nothing to complex there, buddy.

Well that's mostly the case that no one took it seriously, oh wow, that thread isn't praising Eminem, who gives a shit?

As far as The Few True Villains is concerned, I'll let that slide, but that was obviously meant to spite Satire and try to discourage him from making the thread in the first place, as if that's supposed to deter us in the least. Still rather odd considering Block has held his own against them, and Satire has shown to be a formidabble debator, only one that would make you even think that would be because of the animosity you have towards Class, but that's a different discussion.

Again, what made you want to pick on his word choice in the first place? Don't even try and tell me it's because I wanted to be an asshole, you're not fooling anyone, you're playing a stupid semantical game in which you even conceded that you were wrong, but what was the catalyst to make you want to pick apart semantics, if not because of being irked by the thread idea?

[DƎRDYPK]

in other words





























[didn't know where else to put it...shit]

[Satire]

You said to "Rephrase it" so yes, you were obviously claiming that I used the word in the wrong context.

And I'm fully aware that you think the word choice is "retarded", but why should that affect me considering it was used properly and expressed exactly what I wanted to say? The whole plan in general isn't to "takeover" anything, but I used that word to express the occurrence of the thread itself. It's the exact direction I wanted to imply, but you're trying to interpret it as broader.

You didn't prove anything except that YOU took the word too literally.

Yes. I know that...

I already accepted your meaning of takeover in the context in which you had used it in that post. After saying that, I told you that the takeover you're planning to do is very minimal and unimpactful as opposed to IT vs Em.

Yeah, I took it too literally. But, the point in criticizing your word choice was too express how I think that this fabricated thread will not be someting major.

We're not trying to be "impactful" (Not a word btw, I could nitpick you and tell you why you should rephrase that but I won't because I'm not that much of a sarcastic cunt), we're just making a topic that we think would be a fun idea. It started off as trying to piss everybody off when I asked the questions to diction & class but if you didn't realize I planned on Eminem being generally high on the list, so I'm not trying to make an IT vs. Em here.

If you already accepted that I used the word correctly, you should just stop replying, or better yet, you should have just said "I don't think this will have a lasting impression on anybody in the Eminem-section", in which case I would have still told you "It's not about that anymore".

"I think the way that you used paragraphs and semantics to try to express your opinion rather than being straightforward about it is retarded" That is basically what you're doing right now.

So yes, in the end, I used the word right, you don't like how I used the word, you don't think this thread will be big, I don't care. That's the summation of the page of rebuttals we just debated, that could have been said in 2-3 posts. THAT'S "Retarded". This shouldn't even be an argument, just say it.

[Master Chief]

Lol.

[dead prez]

Lol.

So did your goal in trying to piss us off work than?

[Satire]

This would be a good place to shout "TROLL" rather than carrying on the stupidest argument ever.

[Master Chief]

Lol.

So did your goal in trying to piss us off work than?

My half goal was to cause an argument over nothing. I succeeded there.

ONE THING though.

This argument wasn't about your word choice, Fagonfire. It was about the minimal impact that your thread will have.

[Satire]

Lol.

So did your goal in trying to piss us off work than?

My half goal was to cause an argument over nothing. I succeeded there.

ONE THING though.

This argument wasn't about your word choice, Fagonfire. It was about the minimal impact that your thread will have.

I fucking know. You've made that clear in your last 3 posts, and I already acknowledged that and responded how it isn't about the "impact" anymore, or else I would just hype the fuck out of the thread and put Eminem in the honorable mentions.

[Master Chief]

I fucking know.

I don't know why I LOLOLOLOLOL'd @ that but I did

I already acknowledged that and responded how it isn't about the "impact" anymore, or else I would just hype the fuck out of the thread and put Eminem in the honorable mentions.

Concession accepted?

[Satire]

I fucking know.

I don't know why I LOLOLOLOLOL'd @ that but I did

I already acknowledged that and responded how it isn't about the "impact" anymore, or else I would just hype the fuck out of the thread and put Eminem in the honorable mentions.

Concession accepted?

How is that a concession in any way when the intention changed long before you even tried to argue semantics pitifully?

[Master Chief]

argue semantics pitifully

Relax.

How is that a concession in any way when the intention changed long before you even tried to argue semantics pitifully?

Then why did you use "Take-Over"?

[Satire]

argue semantics pitifully

Relax.

How is that a concession in any way when the intention changed long before you even tried to argue semantics pitifully?

Then why did you use "Take-Over"?

I just explained that at the beginning of the argument and you acknowledged that I used it right. Are you serious?

I did not use it in a way to say that my thread was going to be HUGE, or "take over the forum", in fact I could just pass it off as a sarcastic remark and say it meant the opposite. I used it to express the occurrence of the thread itself.

[Master Chief]

I just explained that at the beginning of the argument and you acknowledged that I used it right. Are you serious?

I did not use it in a way to say that my thread was going to be HUGE, or "take over the forum", in fact I could just pass it off as a sarcastic remark and say it meant the opposite. I used it to express the occurrence of the thread itself.

So, you admit that this thread isn't gonna be nothing big just like I originally said?