Mos Def?








Cube23 wrote:
I don't understand how you can say that. Aside from the singles, his lyrics on that were pretty much of a high quality. He didn't force (too many) jokes or any cheesy punchlines for the most part. He rhymed words that don't even rhyme due to the accent and it had very vivid storytelling and fantastic rhyme schemes at times.

Accor wrote:Cube23 wrote:
I don't understand how you can say that. Aside from the singles, his lyrics on that were pretty much of a high quality. He didn't force (too many) jokes or any cheesy punchlines for the most part. He rhymed words that don't even rhyme due to the accent and it had very vivid storytelling and fantastic rhyme schemes at times.
If you're judging it solely on rhyme schemes it's great. But other than that, his flow, and the production/mixing, it's bad. It's very bad in every aspect of lyricism other than rhymes other than on a few songs. He took a huge step back lyrically with that album, he of all people should know that rhyming just to rhyme isn't impressive. Things like "catapult, at an adult", "masturbating to a hockey mask at a boxing match" etc. are laughable.
Plus the story telling isn't vivid, a lot of the time he's just listing random serial-killer like things. Deja Vu, My Mom, Must Be The Ganja (second verse) and Same Song and Dance (first verse) are impressive.





Man1x wrote:Recovery & Hell: The Sequel get a bad rap (no pun intended) in general. They aren't as bad as they are made out to be. I mean they are not revolutionary like Eminem's first three albums and certainly not as good, but they are of higher quality than most albums (not all). That all being said, Eminem is not the best rapper doing it currently. In my opinion, it would Kendrick Lamar, but I'm sure that's where we all differ.



Cube23 wrote:
Third verse of Bagpipes From Baghdad and all of Stay Wide Awake are impressive, as well.
Your two examples of terrible lyricism was from the only non-single I disliked. Underground was terrible and rhyming to rhyme is just silly. I agree. But his lyrics were coherent on much of the album and the whole thing had a cinematic story feel to it. I had no problem with the production or lyrical content on it. I thought it was a nice step for Eminem and I thouroughly enjoy Relapse.
His delivery/accent, beats, and lyrics were perfectly fine to me.... which is why I have a massive problem with Recovery. Because all of those categories took an incredibly large step down from Relapse.
Man1x wrote:Recovery & Hell: The Sequel get a bad rap (no pun intended) in general. They aren't as bad as they are made out to be. I mean they are not revolutionary like Eminem's first three albums and certainly not as good, but they are of higher quality than most albums (not all). That all being said, Eminem is not the best rapper doing it currently. In my opinion, it would Kendrick Lamar, but I'm sure that's where we all differ.


flyingmonkey10 wrote:Kid Cudi?
Mos Def?


Menzo wrote:
What are you talking aboutSo the lines from "Underground", a song that had no real intentions besides senseless rhyming is enough to make such a decision? He didn't "rhyme just to rhyme" except realistically, on the aforementioned song.
The only flaw on Relapse was "Beautiful" because lyrically and delivery wise, it does not fit. Your initial complain was that Eminem has been inconsistent since 2003 but Relapse was far from inconsistent on every level.
Also, Recovery is not nearly as "un-lyrical" as you and others might think.
Menzo wrote:People also act as if H:TS was a sit down project where Em was up til 3am thinking of concepts and lines. That shit was whipped together over a few months for the fuck of it and the ones that we know they intentionally made for the EP were probably the best ones on the EP.

Revolutionary wrote:Honestly, as I said before...People become super critical when it's Em.
It's just what they do, they hate that he gets called the greatest, so whenever he drops an average/dope release they make it seem as if it's the weakest shit out there, even know they bump weaker shit and call it good music.
And hating new Em seems like the thing that would make you look cool in the internet, it's pathetic.






Menzo wrote:I'll agree, the overall sound of Recovery isn't as transitionally cohesive as any of his previous projects but that doesn't come down to his song writing. I'd be much more understanding if it were all of his or Dre's production and it felt off the wall. Granted at the end of it all, it was up to him to put together a collective group of instrumentals that complimented each other well.
I rather enjoy his back and forth type of tracks on Recovery though, one moment it's intense and inexplicably vulgar and then next it's serious and heartfelt...it's as if recovering is as unstable and steady as his track order. That's definitely something I made up for my own sake though.
But to call his previous album garbage? I can never agree, I think the only garbage he's put out now is Encore. And until something is that bad, disregarding the listener's preferences or not, then it's still head and neck above garbage.


Menzo wrote:Are you blind or just ignorant? I said "Beautiful" didn't fit because of its lyrical strength and delivery. Conceptually, it does essentially fit the album's storyline.
Who is denying a handful of corny punchlines? What does the point of being a "filler" have to do with this either? We're talking about lyricism, and Em is still sharp on Recovery although not as evident as he was on Relapse.
You complained that on Relapse, he rhymed and sacrificed his message meanwhile when Em focuses on his message more, you complain about the rhyming. Sounds like your typical forever unhappy Eminem fan to me.
Eminem also used to produce albums better than he does now, but both occurred his fuckin prime. Also, "A Kiss" is pretty lyrical if you take the time to listen, especially since it is back and forth so a lot of his rhyme schemes are dependent on Royce's previous one (and vice versa). "The Reunion" isn't that good lyrically, but it's not bad...why are you fuckin complaining about his lyricism on that song? Was he spitting 7 syllables on fuckin "Stan"? His delivery and flow are smooth as fuck, as you said, so what's your deal? He spit with the same flow and tranquility during the 2011 BET Cypher AND rhymed a plethora of syllables throughout...
But there's bound to be a complaint somewhere, so go ahead, continue to feed my curiosity regarding the depths of asshole you dip your arm in to pull out another complaint.



Fleka wrote:Not even gonna go in this lyricism debate, it`s pointless. Em fans can be real stupid, but his haters take that stupidity to a whole other level.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users