Exzibit wrote:sorry if i came off as an asshole, didnt even intent to do that.
most "agnostics" or even christians go by the argument "better to believe in that in case god exists"
yeah, nobody knows for sure if god exists, but for the lack of evidence (and evidence of the bible and other "holy books" being nothing but contemporary stories) i doubt he exists, which is why you could consider me atheist
Okay? I get there's a lack of evidence, thanks for sharing your atheist.
by your description, youd be an atheist too. as nobody KNOWS for sure whether there is a god or an invisible flying plant somewhere, everyone would theoretically be agnostic, its a matter of believes, and as you doubt it, youd be an atheist
Not necessarily. You're basically claiming that its either one extreme or the other, you either OMG don't believe that he exists, or OMG He's real. No. I slightly doubt it, that doesn't make me atheist, because I'm still not for sure, meaning I don't know what I am, Meaning I'm agnostic. You misinterpreted, not me. I never claimed that everyone who doesn't know if he's real or not is agnostic, simply that if you don't know for certain if you believe he's real, then you are. That's where I lie. I slightly doubt it, but by what this post you've made says, that makes me agnostic? umm..
if you express doubts over my claim i can read minds, you dont believe me, but you dont know for sure if i can or not, so youd be agnostic to my claim? If I express full doubt, I'd be atheist. If I express slight doubt, but still wasn't sure, as in I believed it may be possible, but I wasn't going to put faith for or against it, then I'd be agnostic. We're getting somewhere, even with that "comparison"
whether you take part of an argument or not, that doesnt change your inner believes.. unless you are mentally unstable and/or very easily influenced
dafuq
but nice ignoring of my contribution to the thread and instead referring to the 3 lines you misinterpreted as offending.
Why thank you.
Replied in underline/Bold in your quote.