If you're atheist..

[Block]

I'm just butting in to say that string theory is not an alternate theory to the big bang. String theory is trying to combine the theory of relativity, which applies to big objects and quantum theory, which applies to subatomic objects. It has nothing to do with the origins of the universe. Same with M-Theory.

Actually they are. Perhaps you don't understand them?

[Eedee]

"There are no facts involved, only theory"

You still fail to understand the definition of scientific theory. Holy fucking shit.

Stop trolling.

[Block]

Block is obviously trolling, guys. Don't waste your time responding to his attempts.

>Block has a valid argument that cannot be broken
>I'll claim he's trolling so that I don't look like Arney Grape.
>DERRRRRP

[Block]

"There are no facts involved, only theory"

You still fail to understand the definition of scientific theory. Holy fucking shit.

Stop trolling.

You're an arrogant, retarded piece of shit. Do you not realize that if a THEORY was a FACT, there would not be other THEORIES attempting to explain the same thing? If it were a FACT it would not be arguable. There would be 100% agreement within the scientific community. There obviously isn't. Hence: Theory is not fact. Or is that too complicated for your ego to let go of?

[Block]

Scientific theory of the big bang. Let's separate the facts and the theories.


Fact: Rocks exist
Fact: Microscopic particles exist
Fact: Life exists
Fact: Stars and balls of gas exist
Fact: The universe exists

THEORY: HOW THEY ALL CAME IN TO EXISTENCE - nothingness somehow exploded itself in to something
THEORY: Alternate dimensions / Universe (which still doesn't explain how THAT one came to be)
THEORY: Self-sustaining, infinite universe that has always existed


See, those are not facts. They are competing theories that attempt to explain FACTS. But are not facts themselves.

[Eedee]

There you go again... Stop trolling, seriously. It's getting really old.

Of course theories aren't facts, dumbass. I never said they were. I said the Big Bang theory was as close as a theory can get to being a fact. There are facts and using such facts we can conclude the Universe (deal with it, fucking bitch) is expanding from a single point in a huge explosion.

What happened before that? Who knows.
How did this happen? Who knows.

But science is on the case and we're trying to figure it out.

I'm done talking to you because you're obviously trolling. Either that or you're just fucking stupid.

[Eedee]

I don't think anyone is denying the expansion of the Internet.

I see what you did there and you get two thumbs up from me for it.

[Eedee]

I don't think anyone is denying the expansion of the Internet.

I see what you did there and you get two thumbs up from me for it.

Wow...that was completely accidental, holy fuckin' shit @ me

It was fucking funny as shit though.

[Eedee]

Lmao I'm a bit sick with a cold right now, I'll blame that. Cloudy thoughts hahaha

I'm sick too. Sitting at the edge of my bed for 4 hours last night with a trash can in front of me. Not fun at all.

Troll God?

[Eedee]

I'd rather not start something lol. It was a joke.

[Eedee]

I'd rather not start something lol. It was a joke.

I didn't understand

But anyways, I don't think anyone denies the expansion of the UNIVERSE*

As they shouldn't. All I'm saying is that that fact, coupled with other factual clues, leads us the make the Big Bang theory as the leading explanation of the beginning of the universe...

Block, the trolling square, is still stuck on the whole "You think theories are FACTS", which I never said at all lol

[SliK]

Geneticists need to isolate the "close minded fuckwit" gene and remove it from Block ASAP.

Completely ignoring the argument against a creator (Where did this creator come from? Has he exists forever? Why is that possible for a creator and not the universe? Does this creator also have a creator?), says things like the theory of gravity and relativity and evolution etc aren't accurate factual accounts of evidence, and for all these claims he has referenced ONE book, which he "believes" and its our fault for not believing it. Hey jackass, you want to know who else find all their answers from one book? Religious "close minded fuckwits"!

Can you see the connection?

[classthe_king]

I'm just butting in to say that string theory is not an alternate theory to the big bang. String theory is trying to combine the theory of relativity, which applies to big objects and quantum theory, which applies to subatomic objects. It has nothing to do with the origins of the universe. Same with M-Theory.

Actually they are. Perhaps you don't understand them?

I just stated what it was?

[Block]

Of course theories aren't facts, dumbass.

Now you change your story. It's funny how that happens, isn't it? You get cornered and now the story changes?

I never said they were. I said the Big Bang theory was as close as a theory can get to being a fact.

Actually, you said the big bang THEORY was a fact. Again, changing the story.

There are facts and using such facts we can conclude the Universe (deal with it, fucking bitch Aww, how cute!) is expanding from a single point in a huge explosion.

Actually, there are theories that also argue against that. They aren't facts. Stop using that word in these cases.

What happened before that? Who knows.
How did this happen? Who knows.

Of course nobody knows. How any times have I said, "it's all speculation"? But Atheists try to dismiss a creator, the same way creationists attempt to dismiss atheism, simply because nobody knows how or why things came to be. The difference is that I side with the creation theory.

But science is on the case and we're trying to figure it out.

Didn't we already reach this conclusion? " "

I'm done talking to you because you're obviously trolling. Either that or you're just fucking stupid.

Okay, Class.

I'm 'stupid' for disagreeing with you? Or for proving your antiquated ideology as not being the only scientific thought process for how things came to be as they are today? Either way, I think it's safe to assume that your pseudo-intellectual role here is about finished.

[Block]

Who are you? You type almost they same way I'd imagine Helen Keller would--if Helen Keller was the modern day equivalent of a drool cup-wielding side show act. Your attempt at belittlement only goes to serve as a reminder of what's really wrong with the human race. Instead of acting out your angst-riddled rage on me, through your keyboard, perhaps you should take up a yoga class or something. I hear it calms your mind. You know, with all that chi shit.

Geneticists need to isolate the "close minded fuckwit" gene and remove it from Block ASAP.

Completely ignoring the argument against a creator (Where did this creator come from? Has he exists forever? Why is that possible for a creator and not the universe? Does this creator also have a creator?), says things like the theory of gravity and relativity and evolution etc aren't accurate factual accounts of evidence, and for all these claims he has referenced ONE book, which he "believes" and its our fault for not believing it. Hey jackass, you want to know who else find all their answers from one book? Religious "close minded fuckwits"!

Can you see the connection?