You can quit responding, but it won't make you any more right. You will be seen as an ignorant fool who thinks everyone who doesn't agree with him is beneath him. You're obviously smart, and very open-minded, which is why I don't understand how you can't grasp this.
SliK wrote:Gay rights SUPPORTERS (not gay couples) would be hypocritical to argue for one type of love and condemn another.
That is by no means what you said, and it is not what I was arguing. This is the quote I'm referring to (first post of this thread)
What argument can you think of that applies to homosexual marriage, that supports their cause, that doesn't also support incest?
An argument that supports homosexual marriage that does not support incest is the one I have been making all along. That homosexuals do not choose to be homosexuals. Banning marriage on people who were born a certain way is more similar to race discrimination. Cousins are not born in love with each other. You cannot make that same argument for incestuous relationship as you can for homosexual relationships in this case.
You asked for an argument that supports homosexual marriage but doesn't support incesteous marriages, well I have given you one. Now quit the name-calling, it's rule #1 of debating. If you wanted to insult me, go to the rap battles section bro, not the serious debate section.