Elision wrote:I was talking about Kanye. Is his music self-produced?
Almostlity wrote:Grow up faggots
EminemInsider wrote:Jesus Christ, HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE?!?!?!?!?!
It's not a copout when he's kept it consistent for over 20 years. It's genuinely his writing style.Willy wrote:"Tech Language" is most likely something Tech or his fans invented as an excuse for his poor lyricism. It's an easy cop out, comparing his use of the English language to an abstract painter. Elements may be random on their own, but together make up the beautiful picture that is a Tech N9ne song. Insert four butterflies.
I go into detail here: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=143913&start=15Blu wrote:If you could expand more on that, I'm sure most of us would be able to fully appreciate Tech like you guys do.
Elision wrote:It's not a copout when he's kept it consistent for over 20 years. It's genuinely his writing style.Willy wrote:"Tech Language" is most likely something Tech or his fans invented as an excuse for his poor lyricism. It's an easy cop out, comparing his use of the English language to an abstract painter. Elements may be random on their own, but together make up the beautiful picture that is a Tech N9ne song. Insert four butterflies.I go into detail here: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=143913&start=15Blu wrote:If you could expand more on that, I'm sure most of us would be able to fully appreciate Tech like you guys do.
If the Jokerr said fuck purple you'd hate purpleWilly wrote:Elision wrote:It's not a copout when he's kept it consistent for over 20 years. It's genuinely his writing style.Willy wrote:"Tech Language" is most likely something Tech or his fans invented as an excuse for his poor lyricism. It's an easy cop out, comparing his use of the English language to an abstract painter. Elements may be random on their own, but together make up the beautiful picture that is a Tech N9ne song. Insert four butterflies.I go into detail here: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=143913&start=15Blu wrote:If you could expand more on that, I'm sure most of us would be able to fully appreciate Tech like you guys do.
You are missing the point. It may be stylistic, but that doesn't make it good. I could make the stylistic decision to fill my bars with poor grammar, awkward phrasings, and convoluted messages, but that doesn't mean it's good. Plus, Tech already has that covered.
What is your argument? You didn't understand Lance.Willy wrote:A clever spin on the classic "I know you are, but what am I?". I'll be sure to add it to my arsenal, lol.
Ahh you edited the post - I'll leave my rebuttal there just in case you decide to change it back. You're getting kind of desperate now and aren't focusing on my argument. Try to look at what's relevant my little friend.
Here's where the confusion happened and if it was my fault I apologize. But it seemed like you didn't understand what makes tech an entertainer as a whole. Because when I referred to my sig you said I missed the point. But now you're saying that you agree.Willy wrote:Blu asked about Tech language. I wasn't familiar with the term but took a stab at it. You confirmed my definition, but also missed the point of the post by saying that it was stylistic.
just let it die dude. there's nothing left to be saidRevolutionary wrote:I'm a fan of Tech N9ne and I don't need a dictionary to translate his shit, he spits a lot of weird lines that seem like they don't make sense but if you focus on it, you'll get it.
Maybe it's because I grew up listening to Brotha Lynch Hung, but I don't find his lyrics nonsensical.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]