what do u guys think of gay marriage?

by **neha** » Jun 29th, '06, 16:40

i dont give a fuck if homos want to get married....its just a piece of paper, they already do live together and ''stuff''. thatis their own choice BUT they cannot adopt children...i am against that.....

by **katastrophe** » Jun 29th, '06, 19:30

im gonna say two words and i dont care if it offends anyone. FUCK GAYS!!!! except lesbians

by **Restlesswon** » Jun 29th, '06, 21:37

katastrophe wrote:im gonna say two words and i dont care if it offends anyone. FUCK GAYS!!!! except lesbians

ahhaha word

by **Tomega** » Jun 29th, '06, 21:55

if u say no ur a damn racist
ppl cant help being gay, so why lower them to take away rights?
its unfair... and totally riduculous and too goddamn conservative
in what prehistorical time do you live?

and about ppl who said: no, because of god
i dont have words for that, coz i'd insult ppl if i talk about that

by **Tomega** » Jun 29th, '06, 22:00

Angie wrote:
Tomega wrote:if u say no ur a damn racist
ppl cant help being gay, so why lower them to take away rights?
its unfair... and totally riduculous and too goddamn conservative
in what prehistorical time do you live?

and about ppl who said: no, because of god
i dont have words for that, coz i'd insult ppl if i talk about that

being a fag aint a race foo!!! give a hoot read a damn muda-fucking book! omg i cant belive u said this!!!

ok discrimination was what i meant
my bad

by **Tomega** » Jun 29th, '06, 22:02

AspirinE wrote:
MuNxMuN wrote:you and your big words i barely understood what natural selection meant *stupid biology*

anyways......
who says homo's aren't fit to survive? you? lmao they're still human like you and me the only difference is that they prefer their own sex instead of the opposite or are you talking about that they'll be shunned from society and everyone else cause their homo and how do they become dependant on other people?

this is confusing.....i'm going to school

do we live in that situation
maybe in your town

they cannot breed, they choose to abandone basic manly instinctics.

If u had 4 people left on this planet and out of those there were 2 men and 2 women. They would naturally have to follow instinct (going for the woman) to survive. Homosexuality will kill them.

Homosexuality is ones personal preference and nothing more, its their choice indeed, but changing laws because of them encouraging behaviour that is naturally irrational would be wrong.

by **Fi.J.** » Jul 3rd, '06, 17:45

yes,I'm for gay marriage..but I'm not sure about gays adopting kids..dunno,in a way it's ok,but then I think about the kids life..and dunno..

by **A Chicago Thing** » Jul 3rd, '06, 19:34

1. homosexuality is not a choice, it's how you are born. You're an uneducated dumbass if you think it's choice.

2. if you live in western culture, gay marriage is going to happen within the next 25 years.

3. for those that think they just become dependent and a drain, in capitialist soceity, the gays actually own everyone. dual incomes - no kids. (the men, women are actually worse off)

4. if a church don't want gays in their house of god, that's cool. but for the government to be against it is retarded. gay marriage = more money for the country.

If u had 4 people left on this planet and out of those there were 2 men and 2 women. They would naturally have to follow instinct (going for the woman) to survive. Homosexuality will kill them

actually, chances are one will be gay. 1 gay = less competition. 2 straight guys could kill each other over a mate. I read a good theory on this about hunterer and gatherers and how homosexuality helped eliminate competition and promoted growth in tribes.

by **AspirinE** » Jul 3rd, '06, 19:57

A Chicago Thing wrote:1. homosexuality is not a choice, it's how you are born. You're an uneducated dumbass if you think it's choice.

Depends how u see the world.. pedophiles are natural too you know..
Survival of the fittest naturally kills a homo...

2. if you live in western culture, gay marriage is going to happen within the next 25 years.

too bad for western culture... maybe we should import more real women there.

3. for those that think they just become dependent and a drain, in capitialist soceity, the gays actually own everyone. dual incomes - no kids. (the men, women are actually worse off)

People are people... but this is once again a point of view .... Depends on how u see homosexuality.

4. if a church don't want gays in their house of god, that's cool. but for the government to be against it is retarded. gay marriage = more money for the country.

church= stupid- they should be burnt just for the fuck of it anyway..

actually, chances are one will be gay. 1 gay = less competition. 2 straight guys could kill each other over a mate. I read a good theory on this about hunterer and gatherers and how homosexuality helped eliminate competition and promoted growth in tribes.

Not if ur main objective as a living thing is to reproduce and survive..
Untill one fag developes ovaries and vagina (or something else for the matter) the two of them left alive will die in misery, with dicks in they mouths.

by **A Chicago Thing** » Jul 3rd, '06, 23:17

AspirinE wrote:Depends how u see the world.. pedophiles are natural too you know..
Survival of the fittest naturally kills a homo...

too bad for western culture... maybe we should import more real women there.

People are people... but this is once again a point of view .... Depends on how u see homosexuality.

church= stupid- they should be burnt just for the fuck of it anyway..

Not if ur main objective as a living thing is to reproduce and survive..
Untill one fag developes ovaries and vagina (or something else for the matter) the two of them left alive will die in misery, with dicks in they mouths.

pedophiles are fucked in the head. and if it is your point of view that homos are fucked in the head, cool. But you're admiting that it is not choice. Thus making the entire statement irrelevant. Survival of the fittest also kills heterosexuals (insert elipses) see how irrelevent that comment is?

more real women? how creative. Too bad western culture controls the now and the past and probably the future. Must of been all those faggots!

People ARE people. Who gives a fuck where someone sticks their penis. i'm glad you caught on.

yes cause burning people is always a viable solution! hurray!

main objection to reproduce - that's your point of view. Even so, like i said earlier, homo's enable others to reproduce because they're obviously not fighting over the same people. survival, I already explained this. Also prevents over population. I don't see how some humans not reproducing as a bad thing. gays are a small population of the human race since day 1 and will be until humans cease to exist. Obviously, we're still here, it's amazing they haven't killed us off yet especially with your overly simplified model that someone thought was halarious and witty which brings me too..

mc maybe - it's amazing how fitting this thread is, take Asps dick out of your mouth, thanks.

by **Shadyluva** » Jul 4th, '06, 01:05

PEOPLE SHUD BE ALLOWED 2 MARRY WHO THEY WANT...NO MATTER WUT RACE/SEX THEY R...ii DON THiiNK OTHA PPL SHUD HAVE A PROBLEM WiiT iiT EiiTHER...CUZ THEY R NOT THE ONES DOiiN iiT...ii PERSONALLY WUD NEVER GO LESBiiAN THO

by **Infliction** » Jul 4th, '06, 03:14

i vote yes, they should be aloud, but when i see two gay guys, i usually get uncomfortable around them, then again some straight people make me uncomfortable, but i say they should be aloud, freedom mahfucka!

by **AspirinE** » Jul 4th, '06, 07:22

A Chicago Thing wrote:
pedophiles are fucked in the head. and if it is your point of view that homos are fucked in the head, cool. But you're admiting that it is not choice. Thus making the entire statement irrelevant. Survival of the fittest also kills heterosexuals (insert elipses) see how irrelevent that comment is?

Actually its not irrelivant... ur argument is as onesided asmine. I made my point perfectly clear.

more real women? how creative. Too bad western culture controls the now and the past and probably the future. Must of been all those faggots!

Yeah, lets all be white racist colonizers, gay colonzers.

People ARE people. Who gives a fuck where someone sticks their penis. i'm glad you caught on.

yes cause burning people is always a viable solution! hurray!

Im glad that u can still differ from the joke and the serious part of the post
main objection to reproduce - that's your point of view. Even so, like i said earlier, homo's enable others to reproduce because they're obviously not fighting over the same people. survival, I already explained this. Also prevents over population. I don't see how some humans not reproducing as a bad thing. gays are a small population of the human race since day 1 and will be until humans cease to exist. Obviously, we're still here, it's amazing they haven't killed us off yet especially with your overly simplified model that someone thought was halarious and witty which brings me too.
.

If u wanna be homo.. be homo, fine, but naturally homosexualls are not given kids and they cant provide parenthood, coz they dont got neigher the hormones or the female mentality to do it. Once again... it depends on if u see overpopulation as a big - , or just a natural thing, that is controlled by human well being.

mc maybe - it's amazing how fitting this thread is, take Asps dick out of your mouth, thanks.

Mc maybes post has nothing to do with mine, dont fantasise about ^ .. thats mad gay bro.

by **Tomega** » Jul 4th, '06, 08:41

i know a girl and she has two moms

she's just normal and her mothers too, i don't see any problem with that situation

what do u guys think of gay marriage?

should gays be able to marry

Who is online