I thought there was a fair bit of filler/uninteresting lines on the album.
The pitchfork review kind of sums up how I feel, but I'd rate this album a little higher than they did.
SliK wrote:The pitchfork review was spot on.
mononym wrote:mononym approves Trilla
SliK wrote:I thought there was a fair bit of filler/uninteresting lines on the album.
The pitchfork review kind of sums up how I feel, but I'd rate this album a little higher than they did.
Trilla wrote:SliK wrote:The pitchfork review was spot on.
No, it wasn't.
It's basically them saying "we don't like it so we're giving it a 4"
brazen homophobia lmfao.
Have you noticed pitchfork writers happen to write a lot of nonsense as well?
"The only salvation for a lot of these songs is Eminem’s alchemical control of rhyme and diction, but even that can be a liability."
alchemical?
"Eminem and Rubin are not a match." Even tho the album itself proved that they are...I bet they wouldnt write this had Rubin decided to sample some more...oh idk DARING and INNOVATIVE songs that APPEAL TO THE MASSES sorta like he did on *cough* Yeezus *cough*
if you dont like the production and concepts thats fine but at least appreciate the experimentation that went into this album and depths Em had to go to to make it all work.
BILI wrote:SliK wrote:I thought there was a fair bit of filler/uninteresting lines on the album.
The pitchfork review kind of sums up how I feel, but I'd rate this album a little higher than they did.
Well thats because your music taste sucks..
SliK wrote:BILI wrote:SliK wrote:I thought there was a fair bit of filler/uninteresting lines on the album.
The pitchfork review kind of sums up how I feel, but I'd rate this album a little higher than they did.
Well thats because your music taste sucks..
Are you still upset that I said MBDTF and gkmc are better than MMLP2?
If you think that's bad taste in music then you're a moron.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]