Kill You wrote:mononym wrote:but pitchfork is the correct opinion
mononym impaled himself on a pitchfork.
Tragic.
Kill You wrote:mononym wrote:but pitchfork is the correct opinion
mononym impaled himself on a pitchfork.
bigray wrote:What's pitchfork?
-GoBerzerk- wrote:bigray wrote:What's pitchfork?
KanyeToThe if it was a review site.
mononym wrote:but pitchfork is the correct opinion
Kill You wrote:Their K. Dot review is probably right but Yeezus...lol, fuck that shit. Fucking 6 on a good day.
bigray wrote:What's pitchfork?
Kill You wrote:Their K. Dot review is probably right but Yeezus...lol, fuck that shit. Fucking 6 on a good day.
Solace wrote:bigray wrote:What's pitchfork?
A fairly good site that everyone on TR hates because they give Kanye consistently good reviews while giving Eminem bad scores even though none of it matters
Trimss wrote:Solace wrote:bigray wrote:What's pitchfork?
A fairly good site that everyone on TR hates because they give Kanye consistently good reviews while giving Eminem bad scores even though none of it matters
This is innacurate. A lot of people outside of TR hate Pitchfork because most of the times, they tend to criticize the artist instead of actually saying what's wrong with the music.
Trimss wrote:This is innacurate. A lot of people outside of TR hate Pitchfork because most of the times, they tend to criticize the artist instead of actually saying what's wrong with the music.
Solace wrote:Trimss wrote:This is innacurate. A lot of people outside of TR hate Pitchfork because most of the times, they tend to criticize the artist instead of actually saying what's wrong with the music.
Show me examples of these people outside of TR then and I'll surrender
The majority of criticism, however, is aimed at the site's album reviewing style. Critics argue the site often emphasizes a reviewers' own writing over the actual music being reviewed, sometimes not even reviewing the album and instead criticising the artist's integrity.[12] Pitchfork is also known to give "0.0" ratings, deeming the work as utterly worthless. One critic wrote that Pitchfork's "0.0" rating of a particular album amounts to no more than a "cheap publicity stunt" for a website that "thrives on controversy."[14] The critic also hypothetically asked how a neo-Nazi punk record would be scored in comparison to these "0.0" albums, based on Pitchfork standards.[14]
Trimss wrote:Solace wrote:Trimss wrote:This is innacurate. A lot of people outside of TR hate Pitchfork because most of the times, they tend to criticize the artist instead of actually saying what's wrong with the music.
Show me examples of these people outside of TR then and I'll surrender
A lot of people hate it on KTT too but aight I'll give you an example.
Trimss wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitchfork_Media#CriticismThe majority of criticism, however, is aimed at the site's album reviewing style. Critics argue the site often emphasizes a reviewers' own writing over the actual music being reviewed, sometimes not even reviewing the album and instead criticising the artist's integrity.[12] Pitchfork is also known to give "0.0" ratings, deeming the work as utterly worthless. One critic wrote that Pitchfork's "0.0" rating of a particular album amounts to no more than a "cheap publicity stunt" for a website that "thrives on controversy."[14] The critic also hypothetically asked how a neo-Nazi punk record would be scored in comparison to these "0.0" albums, based on Pitchfork standards.[14]
You chan check the sources in the Wikipedia article, they should work. But I doubt it would be on Wikipedia if TR was the only place they get criticized for their reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users