
Drax207 wrote:beowafle wrote:It makes the song better for me imagining it's Kim's perspective ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
same
Jimmy Conway wrote:The song is about Kim.
It's a revisit to the MMLP. Kim was a big song, that relationship was a big deal then, probably still is today.
I think it's all about her.
"I'm done being your punching bag, it was the November 31st today
Would've been our anniversary, two years but you left on the 1st of May"
People use that to say it isn't about her. But when asked about Headlights, he wouldn't get into it. A few years ago when asked about Hallie, he wouldn't talk about her, in the MMLP2, he didn't even say Hallie's name, he just said "her" in headlights.
He is trying to get some privacy back in his life, to control what people know, not just let everyone know everything.
November doesn't even have 31 days in it. He just made up a date to not put details of their anniversary on blast.
LEVITIKUZ wrote:Revolutionary wrote:He would eat 2 steaks and still have room for a third. He went to a steak restaurant for his 40th birthday, remember?
No because Em didn't invite me.
EminemBase wrote:Because Em fans love to make simple songs of his in to bizarre conceptual theories.
Em always makes clear what the concept or his idea is... in fact if there's one major thing to note since his return, it's his paranoia that people won't understand the intention or irony or concept or line... hence why he made Skylar Grey do that little bridge 'fuck you for thinking it's true'...
So there's no way he would just write from Kim's perspective and hope you get it.
Em makes shit crystal clear 'EMINEM KILLED BY M & M, MATTHEW MITCHELL!!'.
The song is 100% a normal love song, from Em's perspective.
Snake897 wrote:I don't think Eminem is allowed to legally say Kim's name in a song.
Amadeo wrote:Snake897 wrote:I don't think Eminem is allowed to legally say Kim's name in a song.
Remember 2000? When Eminem didn't care whether he could "legally say" things on songs, and just did it anyway? Back when he called his mother's lawyer a faggot?
Back when he had balls. It wasn't a matter of "oh damn, I can't say his/her name legally on a song." It was "well, they say I can't say his/her name but that's bullshit so I will. Sue me."
trentimus wrote:EminemBase wrote:Because Em fans love to make simple songs of his in to bizarre conceptual theories.
Em always makes clear what the concept or his idea is... in fact if there's one major thing to note since his return, it's his paranoia that people won't understand the intention or irony or concept or line... hence why he made Skylar Grey do that little bridge 'fuck you for thinking it's true'...
So there's no way he would just write from Kim's perspective and hope you get it.
Em makes shit crystal clear 'EMINEM KILLED BY M & M, MATTHEW MITCHELL!!'.
The song is 100% a normal love song, from Em's perspective.
I agree with you but just to play devil's advocate.. not only is he not allowed to say Kim's name but he cannot make it obvious a song is about her.
trentimus wrote:I dont really think the lyrics make sense for it to be Kim.. But it wouldn't change how I feel.. He can't sing, so it makes no sense when it's not like Mockingbird or something meaningful..
Amadeo wrote:Snake897 wrote:I don't think Eminem is allowed to legally say Kim's name in a song.
Remember 2000? When Eminem didn't care whether he could "legally say" things on songs, and just did it anyway? Back when he called his mother's lawyer a faggot?
Back when he had balls. It wasn't a matter of "oh damn, I can't say his/her name legally on a song." It was "well, they say I can't say his/her name but that's bullshit so I will. Sue me."
mononym wrote:mononym approves Trilla
EminemBase wrote:trentimus wrote:EminemBase wrote:Because Em fans love to make simple songs of his in to bizarre conceptual theories.
Em always makes clear what the concept or his idea is... in fact if there's one major thing to note since his return, it's his paranoia that people won't understand the intention or irony or concept or line... hence why he made Skylar Grey do that little bridge 'fuck you for thinking it's true'...
So there's no way he would just write from Kim's perspective and hope you get it.
Em makes shit crystal clear 'EMINEM KILLED BY M & M, MATTHEW MITCHELL!!'.
The song is 100% a normal love song, from Em's perspective.
I agree with you but just to play devil's advocate.. not only is he not allowed to say Kim's name but he cannot make it obvious a song is about her.
It might be ABOUT her. But it certainly is not from her or a female perspective.
People just want to make a flat-out emotional song more complex, because it's Em.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users