ganjakush56 wrote:chikachika wrote:Groundhog Day is MMLP 1 material
no its not
StayWideAwake wrote:SliK wrote:Nobody said it was a bad thing.
That's usually what is implied. Since it's his best album, if it's deemed "not MMLP-ish" it implies some type of shortcoming. For example, even in all of it's successes, Rap God is not MMLP material and therefore flawed in some way ("because MMLP Em wouldn't say the 'batter the women' line", therefore the other 99% is taken down a notch from the golden standard). Said or unsaid, it's a very obvious connotation.
chikachika wrote:ganjakush56 wrote:chikachika wrote:Groundhog Day is MMLP 1 material
no its not
Its better
Rollefsen wrote:this guy is THE Spongebob.
Menzo wrote:one of my lowkey favourite 'newcomers' atm.
cement wrote:youre that real nikka
Revolutionary wrote:MMLP2 is genius.
chikachika wrote:ganjakush56 wrote:chikachika wrote:Groundhog Day is MMLP 1 material
no its not
Its better
StayWideAwake wrote:You know exactly what I mean and you are trying so hard to act like you don't.
You take a statement to it's literal and absolute extreme to distort my actual point to make an argument. It's a straw man. Just like when I said "Just because a song isn't super deep and poetic it doesn't mean it's actually 'saying nothing'". You respond with "Umm.. okay so by your definition any song that contains any lyrics at all has 'content'". You knew my statement wasn't "it has lyrics, therefore it has content", but you thought it would be a clever response anyway. Now, when I talk about the connotation around saying any new Em song isn't MMLP material, you distort the argument and say, "Yeah well other albums and songs don't sound like MMLP and they are still classics". Please stop. It isn't clever.
StayWideAwake wrote:You know exactly what I mean and you are trying so hard to act like you don't.
You take a statement to it's literal and absolute extreme to distort my actual point to make an argument. It's a straw man. Just like when I said "Just because a song isn't super deep and poetic it doesn't mean it's actually 'saying nothing'". You respond with "Umm.. okay so by your definition any song that contains any lyrics at all has 'content'". You knew my statement wasn't "it has lyrics, therefore it has content", but you thought it would be a clever response anyway. Now, when I talk about the connotation around saying any new Em song isn't MMLP material, you distort the argument and say, "Yeah well other albums and songs don't sound like MMLP and they are still classics". Please stop. It isn't clever.
Menzo wrote:So satanic, K-Mart chains panic
Cause they can't even spin back the curse words
Cause they're worse when they're reversed motherfucker
"Rape your mother, kill your parents" [shit, motherfucker]
![]()
Fucking sick.
CrashBand wrote:StayWideAwake still taking L's.
Getting B's in Philosophy 101 and 102 really went to his head and tried to argue with the big boys.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users