,-,'-{Bar}-',-, wrote:both


,-,'-{Bar}-',-, wrote:both
C-Game wrote:not sure.. im talkin wit mart and i talked with ma friend of site...
there are some qlty issues///
ThomasAguanis wrote:C-Game wrote:not sure.. im talkin wit mart and i talked with ma friend of site...
there are some qlty issues///
alright. I'm looking forward to see who's picked. and if quality is bad...could people rerecord their verses? I'm sure everyone on it has better quality/ knows how to make themselves sound better now.
and forgot to say congratulations on getting it on the radio in the first place.that seems like a big enough task in itself.
Kez wrote:ThomasAguanis wrote:C-Game wrote:not sure.. im talkin wit mart and i talked with ma friend of site...
there are some qlty issues///
alright. I'm looking forward to see who's picked. and if quality is bad...could people rerecord their verses? I'm sure everyone on it has better quality/ knows how to make themselves sound better now.
and forgot to say congratulations on getting it on the radio in the first place.that seems like a big enough task in itself.
Very good idea (re-recording it)
But is it possible?
mart85 wrote:cool, and yeah no problem for the wav file... get back at me once you know who stays for the radio version
Users browsing this forum: No registered users