I was just wondering..

In like 2004-2005, i there was definitely much more war supporters than now, many just realized they no longer have any proof of reason so they just shut up...

Maybe wrote:I'm so awesome, I don't mind looking desperate.
Chet wrote:Fuck House. If I wanted to watch a sarcastic person in the medical field, I would stalk Yoshi
there were never wmd. just think about north korea and the fact that we haven't attacked them yet.
would u really go after a country with powerful weapons anyways? the war did start out as a good idea kinda. just for the fact that a man who killed a lot of innocent ppl in the most bizarre ways was killed and his reign as ruler ended. war never is a good idea really, but it at least ended one crazy person's life.
it might still be going on for the oil now, or to help benefit those companies getting all those deals for the reconstruction or whatever, but i think it was a good idea to end saddam's power either way.
it doesn't matter now to impeach him, cuz that wont remove him from office, thats just the process of removing him from office and its too late now to go through all that when we could just wait this next year and a half for him to leave and get another braniac in there.
the deed is done, and theres nothing u can do about it.
u can keep preaching that this is all for oil (which it probably is) but it doesn't change that we're still there and need to just finish the job and leave
i definitely dont think we should just leave, even though thats the easiest thing to do. we do need to help them rebuild
AspirinE wrote:there were never wmd. just think about north korea and the fact that we haven't attacked them yet.
Even if a country has WMD's, does not mean u can label them Evil and attack them.would u really go after a country with powerful weapons anyways? the war did start out as a good idea kinda. just for the fact that a man who killed a lot of innocent ppl in the most bizarre ways was killed and his reign as ruler ended. war never is a good idea really, but it at least ended one crazy person's life.
Good thinking, Sadamm had some blood of a few people in his hands and you Kill 600 000(and counting)in return, destroying and robbing the country. I say america should be wiped out the same way for the crimes of the CIA, that killed MILLIONS, sponcering corrupt leaders that killed thousands of people on the regular for even being so much as affiliated with different ideology.it might still be going on for the oil now, or to help benefit those companies getting all those deals for the reconstruction or whatever, but i think it was a good idea to end saddam's power either way.
Sadams dictatorship is NOTHING in comparison to America's. Sadams execution and revision of the crimes that america itself chose to "not notice" in the first place is a lame ass excuse for continueing war. Just getting the americans to even somewhat see some "good" in it.it doesn't matter now to impeach him, cuz that wont remove him from office, thats just the process of removing him from office and its too late now to go through all that when we could just wait this next year and a half for him to leave and get another braniac in there.
Impeachment would be acknowledgment of crime, It wouldnt hurt americans to do one good thing about leaders that are unpunished and keep writing their history clean.the deed is done, and theres nothing u can do about it.
Say what? So u can't impeach and persecute a president that lied to kill and destroy for profit in a democratic country? Nonsense. If a president can get impeached and almost eaten alive for getting some head... then why not a criminal?u can keep preaching that this is all for oil (which it probably is) but it doesn't change that we're still there and need to just finish the job and leave
Your not gonna finish the job there and leave, since you're planning to build long term millitary bases there. JUST the little time that Bush sits in office till he just goes and retires is gonna cost people lives. Lives that don't need to be lost. I donno how one person with any sense in his head doesnt want that to stop.i definitely dont think we should just leave, even though thats the easiest thing to do. we do need to help them rebuild
HAHAHHAHAHAHA.... rebuild... ... ur killing me man.
^ well, thats the point of the debate section i thought...to counteract another person's opinion with ur own and prove them wrong (which asp doesn't do cuz i always win)
it does get annoying cuz he has his mind set in one direction and it never goes off course to accept something that he may have been wrong on.
shady4life! wrote::confusion: i didnt see anythin wrong with wat david said.... But then i go down and i see all of this??
for watU like hav an argument for every single statement!!!
Wat david said was all true, i dont know where u came from with all these negative ideas, and fantasies.
AspirinE wrote:^ well, thats the point of the debate section i thought...to counteract another person's opinion with ur own and prove them wrong (which asp doesn't do cuz i always win)
U wish.
anyways, it doesn't bother me. he always is like that.it does get annoying cuz he has his mind set in one direction and it never goes off course to accept something that he may have been wrong on.
What am i wrong on? that all life is valuable, bush should be punished? I think you need your head checked.
Insead of making statements like "because ur wrong", prove me wrong.
i didnt say u were wrong on this, im just saying in general....and it was more of a joke. i understand u have ur beliefs and think ur right, everybody does. that it makes it hard to prove ur wrong, when most arguments from us are based on opinions and/or educated suspicions. such as the 9/11 shit and everything else. although there might be strong evidence, theres no true answer that we know is 100% real so either side could be right on the issue
AspirinE wrote:i didnt say u were wrong on this, im just saying in general....and it was more of a joke. i understand u have ur beliefs and think ur right, everybody does. that it makes it hard to prove ur wrong, when most arguments from us are based on opinions and/or educated suspicions. such as the 9/11 shit and everything else. although there might be strong evidence, theres no true answer that we know is 100% real so either side could be right on the issue
What suspicion. Bush and Cheney flatout lied for profit and violent takeover policy in the middle east. It is because of that they need to be impeached and half your country doesnt believe what your president says or even aprove of him.
I see no sense in dismissing it to the grounds of "may or may not". It's pretty obvious now.
In a court of law somebody would've been charged as lying, for the contradictions the neo-cons are spewing. Reasonable doubt should at least stop the murders in iraq, no sense in sugar coating it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users