mcZu wrote:MC Anonymous wrote:Not true, asexual reproduction can happen as well as sexual reproduction. However, it is ''natural'' for a male and female to have sex and reproduce. If it is psychological as you say it is, then it is still in the genetics of the person otherwise the laws of nature would make it so no male or female will be sexually attracted to the same sex.
Going by that logic racist people would have racist genes, which is highly unlikely. And nature has made it that way, but nature does not orchestrate our phychological developments. Otherwise we would still be acting like hunters and cavemen, and we obviously don't (most of us).Take hermaphodites for example, they are born with both body genetilia, correct? If that's the case that is a sexual gene mutation. Doctors still now and back then usually make or made the decision to whether or not the hermaphodite will be a male or female. Hence, most gay men and gay woman have the same mannerisms and voice intonation. One higher pitched and one lower pitched.
That's just a case of hormones. They got too much of both types, which makes them that what they are. Usually, if I'm not mistaken, they are female but have too much testosorone. Which leads to an uncommon growth in the clitoris, which on turn makes it look like a ''penis.''That may be one of the reasons why an influx of gay people happened during the 1960's due to limited knowledge. Proving my point that, to a certain extent, it is genetic.
During that time there was an influx of feminists, which is why there was an increase in lesbian people. On the other side there were men who got fed up with women... (Just an assumption)
mcZu wrote:MC Anonymous wrote:Not true, asexual reproduction can happen as well as sexual reproduction. However, it is ''natural'' for a male and female to have sex and reproduce. If it is psychological as you say it is, then it is still in the genetics of the person otherwise the laws of nature would make it so no male or female will be sexually attracted to the same sex.
Going by that logic racist people would have racist genes, which is highly unlikely. And nature has made it that way, but nature does not orchestrate our phychological developments. Otherwise we would still be acting like hunters and cavemen, and we obviously don't (most of us).Not true, nowhere in what you quoted do I imply that racist people would have racist genes. Racism is a product of the environment. Homosexuality is not, if you were born in San-Fransisco and was raised there around 100 gays if you were not genetically meant to be gay you would not be. If being gay is a product of the environment then that's saying that if you was born and raised around 100 gays in San-Fransisco then you would be gay. Improbable, right?Take hermaphodites for example, they are born with both body genetilia, correct? If that's the case that is a sexual gene mutation. Doctors still now and back then usually make or made the decision to whether or not the hermaphodite will be a male or female. Hence, most gay men and gay woman have the same mannerisms and voice intonation. One higher pitched and one lower pitched.
That's just a case of hormones. They got too much of both types, which makes them that what they are. Usually, if I'm not mistaken, they are female but have too much testosorone. Which leads to an uncommon growth in the clitoris, which on turn makes it look like a ''penis.''An over abundance of hormones does not cause abnormal growths of genitalia, that would defy the ability for a female to grow breasts and not grow testicles, because as we all know all humans whether male or female have both estrogen and testosterone. Yes, the amount of testosterone in a woman is different then that of a man, but when puberty hits both are in effect. You don't see a normal girl grow a penis or a male to grow breasts. Furthermore, even if what you say is true and what I say is wrong, it is still a genetic problem for a male or female to create more hormones then needed. Specifically in the sexual parts of the chromosomes or genes.That may be one of the reasons why an influx of gay people happened during the 1960's due to limited knowledge. Proving my point that, to a certain extent, it is genetic.
During that time there was an influx of feminists, which is why there was an increase in lesbian people. On the other side there were men who got fed up with women... (Just an assumption)
You failed to comment about the hermaphrodites being sexually misplaced in their bodies, thus causing them to be homosexual. Woman being lesbian because they were feminists is completely absurd.
LMFAO@ Brittney, bitch looking worse than a chupacabra mixed with a broken down coyote. You're disgusting ugly, so ugly in fact, my brain simultaneously exploded while processing how bitterly grotesque you look. I would much rather stick ice picks into the walls of my cranium, then stick my dick into your quagmire of a clitoris. You're what would happen if a sperm whale mated with a Godzilla fish..
Not true, nowhere in what you quoted do I imply that racist people would have racist genes. Racism is a product of the environment. Homosexuality is not, if you were born in San-Fransisco and was raised there around 100 gays if you were not genetically meant to be gay you would not be. If being gay is a product of the environment then that's saying that if you was born and raised around 100 gays in San-Fransisco then you would be gay. Improbable, right?
An over abundance of hormones does not cause abnormal growths of genitalia, that would defy the ability for a female to grow breasts and not grow testicles, because as we all know all humans whether male or female have both estrogen and testosterone. Yes, the amount of testosterone in a woman is different then that of a man, but when puberty hits both are in effect. You don't see a normal girl grow a penis or a male to grow breasts. Furthermore, even if what you say is true and what I say is wrong, it is still a genetic problem for a male or female to create more hormones then needed. Specifically in the sexual parts of the chromosomes or genes.
You failed to comment about the hermaphrodites being sexually misplaced in their bodies, thus causing them to be homosexual. Woman being lesbian because they were feminists is completely absurd.
$(@TTY B@Y wrote:Spyder wrote:scotty u need to take a couple breaths man
in............out its a topic and that was a joke
but no i have no problem with gays, just the camps as scott calls em
but it's in serious debate?
Spyder wrote:$(@TTY B@Y wrote:Spyder wrote:scotty u need to take a couple breaths man
in............out its a topic and that was a joke
but no i have no problem with gays, just the camps as scott calls em
but it's in serious debate?
wel yes but not a life or death matter lol
im just watching the show of Anon vs Zu
genereal against general
Spyder wrote:but yes i appreciate u scotty
$(@TTY B@Y wrote:![]()
Xray wrote:
Jeaaaaaaa I'm a Macho Man.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users