Scott M wrote:having no strings attached purely sexual relationship with someone.
Well therein lies the problem, that's not possible.
Scott M wrote:having no strings attached purely sexual relationship with someone.
Scott M wrote:*MIRANDA* wrote:yeah not my cup of tea, id never do that, i would only sleep wiht a guy if i love him and he loves me back and were inna relationship
so one night stands or fuck buddy's are out of the question
just idk, i dont mind if other peeps do it , i mean to each their own but i dont think u should be so careless with yo body like that, seems u dont respect yoself allot to share sumthing special with just whoever, i know id feel so wrong after i would do it, id feel cheapso yeah..
when i hear bout girls sleeping around like that i think theyre cheap but so are the guys that go for girls like that..
if only more girls were like you and sophie.
AspirinE wrote:Miranda > space,matter and time > *
To some people, it is, and i don't mind admitting that for a minuteWic_Kid wrote: Im just sayin that sex is not that big of deal.
Scott M wrote:Wic_Kid wrote:Scott M wrote:@ wic_kid, i'm sorry but that's just how i see it, i'm not trying to 'bullshit' you. and by looking at chett's/sophies comments, it seems like i'm not the only one. i am just not attracted to sluts. end of.
Well, what you call slut, I call normal girl. But what YOU call a slut. Ofc Im not gonna have sex with a girl who has slept with 100 guys before turnin 20. Im just sayin that sex is not that big of deal.
And damn, when did guys start thinkin like this?...
so a girl has to have sex with over 100 guys to fit into the 'slut' category? that's stupid. a slut is someone who sleeps around. end of. look it up if you don't agree with me, there are official definitions out there.
Adam Quinn wrote:I don't know what else to say to you, or how I can explain it to you. You'll figure it out later or maybe you won't. Alls I can say is I use to think just like you do now when I was younger, i had like 'Virgin Syndorme' or some shit. I thought i was going to find the perfect girl and live happily ever after, I though sex was for love between two people and only for that. I thought I was gonna find the perfect the girl and get married and all that bullshit tv and movies sell you. It's bullshit and the harder you fall off that pedestal the more you'll understand what I'm talking about.
And just because you fucked a girl over 100 times or whatever still doesn't change anything because it was the same girl.
Do and think how you want though. I'm seriously just trying to warn you.
Scott M wrote:
@ wic_kid, why are you glad i don't live near you? because i don't sleep around? or because i think that girls who sleep around are sluts? that's a very strange thing to say. why are you targeting me? it seems that 3 other people (chett, miranda and sophie) share exactly the same views as me, but i don't see you saying you're glad they don't live near you. don't single me out.
Scott M wrote:Adam Quinn wrote:I wasn't trying to change your opinion on anything. I was saying don't judge people by what you believe and look down on them because you don't agree with their choices. Never look down on someone, unless you're helping them up, man.
i'm not looking down on them, i'm just put off by them. how many times do i have to say this?
Scott M wrote:Wic_Kid wrote:Scott M wrote:i'm not looking down on them, i'm just put off by them. how many times do i have to say this?
Say what?...
you know, i'm actually gna report you if you keep fucking with my thread or insulting me.
Scott M wrote:le tunisien wrote:if i was you , i would ask her to fuck me already
you REALLY need to start reading posts before you comment.
Scott M wrote:le tunisien wrote:Scott M wrote:you REALLY need to start reading posts before you comment.
i read,and you said she has a fuck buddy,she fucks him just to get what she wants,so yeah i'd ask her to fuck me tooand yeah its ok for me if she has a fuck buddy,i like materialistic girls
she probably wouldn't have sex with you tbh.
EminemIVLife wrote:lol @ girls that love dick being materialistic
Scott M wrote:well, that's what we call them here, but the more widely used term is "fuck buddy" i'm just wondering what people think of the whole fuck buddy idea. having no strings attached purely sexual relationship with someone.
the reason i ask this, is because one of my friends, i've just heard that she has a fuck buddy, and it's changed my opinion on her entirely, especially as i always believed she was worth more than that, now she's just someones toy, regardless of wether she enjoys it or not. it's given her the tag of "slag" imo. i'm not strictly against having sex for fun, but i do get put off a girl, if i know that she's slept around.
thoughts?
Scott M wrote:Jiskefet wrote:Scott M wrote:well, that's what we call them here, but the more widely used term is "fuck buddy" i'm just wondering what people think of the whole fuck buddy idea. having no strings attached purely sexual relationship with someone.
the reason i ask this, is because one of my friends, i've just heard that she has a fuck buddy, and it's changed my opinion on her entirely, especially as i always believed she was worth more than that, now she's just someones toy, regardless of wether she enjoys it or not. it's given her the tag of "slag" imo. i'm not strictly against having sex for fun, but i do get put off a girl, if i know that she's slept around.
thoughts?
Would you have sex with a girl just for fun a few times?
probably not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users